Sundering stuff established in the Q&A

[Alleluia]

She let Emet live, knowing he would go on to form the Ascians and do the rejoinings. If she didn't want them to happen she should have just sundered him. This isn't even purely a "history refused to change" thing either, because we're told that she intentionally made that choice.

Yes, b/c the history we came from had him alive and doing what he did. And, as I said, she didn't force him to do the Rejoining plan. He still made that choice on his own, assuming tempering allowed him a choice at all. She just didn't do something that would stop him. She allowed history to play out how it was "supposed" to b/c it was the only path she knew of that would possibly get us to the good ending of mankind surviving. How does this counter do anything, but support what I said?

Not only did she know about the Rejoinings when she left Emet-Selch alive, her plan hinged upon his actions and she tried to allow him a second chance to live because she felt bad about the part he was manipulated into playing. To say that Venat has basically no issues with sacrificing lives, whether directly or by proxy, is about as text as it can be at this point. If you find that abhorrent, then you find Venat herself abhorrent.

You are saying both that she felt great guilt about the role she let Emet-Selch live out to play, and also that she felt no guilt whatsoever about messing with peoples' lives. This seems contradictory.