Quote Originally Posted by KariTheFox View Post
Maybe it is unethical for the WoL to create beings like the primals for thier own ends. I'm not sure. When I say something "raises a question" that does not mean I'm necessarily advocating for that position, but that the text itself is asking us to think about it.

As for the test, in my view the sundering is an event that is caused by the final days - as are the rejoinings. From a dispassionate, scientific standpoint, the sundering and rejoinings represent two different attempts to perserve mankind, the ascians tried for 12000 years to do it thier way and ultimately failed.

And yes, Venat is cheating and messing up the scientific accuracy of the test by retaining her memories and putting a tracker on Meteion, but we all already agreed that the test was unethical so that's fine.
If i hand out a test to 1 million people to gauge their worth and only 8 actually pass the test...idk about you but i would take it that whatever people im testing arent worthy of whatever lol. Those 8 would be classified as simply outliers. My point is though, we now have people saying that the ancients deserved what they got for doing this "testing" on creations and for getting rid of the ones that didnt make the cut. If this is the case then the sundered should be held to the same standard because they do the same thing everyday.The test being unethical doesnt reallt warrant the cheating though, as it gives an incredible advantage to one side that the other didnt have. The test would be marked as inconclusive if we're basing it off the way irl things work.