What's the point with that quite lackluster story in Endwalker?

[Lurina]

Honestly, I'm kind of hoping they add some additional context to the pre-sundering events via the alliance raids or some such just to put an end to the tired morality arguments getting brought up all the time.

Though I reckon there'd still be a camp of people who would be frustrated if it turned out that the Sundering was undeniably a net positive vs. allowing a world governed by Zodiark to continue.

Personally, I will find a "necessary evil" on that kind of scale being framed as heroic in the way it was kinda creepy and offputting no matter what. Doing a bad thing to prevent a worse thing don't make you a morally better person, just a more pragmatic one.

[linayar]

Doing a bad thing to prevent a worse thing don't make you a morally better person

It depends. Preventing someone from unjustly killing someone else is a moral good regardless of whether, in the process, the would-be murderer is killed.

[Lurina]

It depends. Preventing someone from unjustly killing someone else is a moral good regardless of whether, in the process, the would-be murderer is killed.

That's incredibly subjective. A lot of the US is really lenient about it, but in most legal and ethical systems there's a concept of warranted self-defense or defense of others. If in preventing a crime you use excessive and unnecessary force, or cause collateral damage, then that's still a moral evil. Especially if it isn't an accident and you premeditate it, and especially especially if it's on a grand scale.

[linayar]

That's incredibly subjective. A lot of the US is really lenient about it, but in most legal and ethical systems there's a concept of warranted self-defense or defense of others. If in preventing a crime you use excessive and unnecessary force, or cause collateral damage, then that's still a moral evil. Especially if it isn't an accident and you premeditate it, and especially especially if it's on a grand scale.

It is indeed subjective, especially when it comes to beings who literally made it their mission to direct the fate of the star. Beings who can just offer up prayer to have others be killed. What is "excessive and unnecessary force" in that case?

[Lurina]

It is indeed subjective, especially when it comes to beings who literally made it their mission to direct the fate of the star. Beings who can just offer up prayer to have others be killed. What is "excessive and unnecessary force" in that case?

The collateral damage is what's important in this case. I only brought up the idea of excessive force in referencing concept of unwarranted defense generally.

Though if you wanted to be picky about it, it's bizarre and excessive in retrospect that Hydaelyn sundered the world into 14 parts instead of just, like, 2, presumably causing far greater damage to the selfhood of the people currently living on the planet as a result. We beat Meteion while 9/14 rejoined, so that would have been fine.

[linayar]

The collateral damage is what's important in this case. I only brought up the idea of excessive force in referencing concept of unwarranted defense generally.

We don't know what the collateral damage, if any, is. And collateral means they are unintended, so it has nothing to do with the morality of the perpetrator

Though if you wanted to be picky about it, it's bizarre and excessive in retrospect that Hydaelyn sundered the world into 14 parts instead of just, like, 2, presumably causing far greater damage to the selfhood of the people currently living on the planet as a result. We beat Meteion while 9/14 rejoined, so that would have been fine.

I wasn't aware Hydaelyn planned for there to be a specific amount of parts. Where did you find this information?

[Lurina]

We don't know what the collateral damage, if any, is. And collateral means they are unintended, so it has nothing to do with the morality of the perpetrator

We know that the Sundering affected every living creature on the planet, regardless of whether they Ancients involved in the sacrifices, unrelated Ancients, or other creatures both sentient and otherwise, so there is implicit collateral damage.

And of course it does. If you perform an action knowing there will be collateral damage, or with recklessness in a manner that causes it, then you are morally responsible for the results. If see someone about to detonate a bomb on the other side of a crowded building, and the only way to stop them is to shoot through that crowd, you've still killed everyone hit by those stray bullets, regardless of your intent.

I wasn't aware Hydaelyn planned for there to be a specific amount of parts. Where did you find this information?

I didn't. Like I said, that's something you can pick at if you have a mind to, but it wasn't my original point.

[Lauront]

It is indeed subjective, especially when it comes to beings who literally made it their mission to direct the fate of the star. Beings who can just offer up prayer to have others be killed. What is "excessive and unnecessary force" in that case?

There is nothing in the sources that specifies what it was they were going to sacrifice, or if they were even "people". Again, the sources on the matter state new life (presumably what was seeded by Zodiark as per this.) Things that can have souls span from animals to some rarer familiars to ancients. It is a very broad spectrum. Is it things that could potentially be guided to inherit the star but would take a lot of handholding? E.g. familiars? Maybe ancients? Neither? We can't say, because the sources don't tell. If you're referring to the cutscene in EW, that stylised scene takes place when the star is still on fire, and so presumably refers to the self-sacrifices that were made to restore it, i.e. the second set. It's too vague to infer much else from. The textual sources on the other hand are emphatic on it being "new life" for the final phase and not specifying beyond that.

Moreover, even if I were to grant that they were sacrificing "people", they were initially divided on this (see the sources here - yes, it includes the Convocation as per FR Elidibus dialogue.) Had she been more forthcoming about what her concerns were, they may have been persuaded not to.

To add to this: her faction does not premise this in moralistic terms. They even grant that the Convocation is trying to act in the best interest of the star. See here:



All premised on pragmatic terms about avoiding their "doom". We know from EW she heard the report of the Plenty, and her real beef in the EW cutscene is that she thought, based on the chit-chat with the strawman ancients, that they weren't willing to put up with yet more suffering (I'll put aside how unreasonable she comes across in that scene), and that is why she believes they'd eventually doom themselves. Plus, the issue of Meteion. The sacrifices are ancillary to this because their role is to alleviate suffering by restoring their civilisation. She is not at any point chastising them for the morality of it.

I think at this point people are trying to invent crimes (or at least read known sources in ways that go beyond what they say) to try justify the genocide of the ancients. It is the eradication of their species, and yes, it is excessive. Not materially different to the Ascian view of the sundered, IMO, although they at least had the excuse that the Sundering was sprung on them out of the blue and that they saw it as their role to undo what she had done. Something she knew full well that they'd do when committing to her course of action, and after choosing not to inform them on what motivated her actions. A lot of this is driven by the fact that we're dealing with a closed time loop, but I for one am not going to pretend that if what the Ascians did is genocide, that what she did isn't. Nah.

Regarding intent, if she did not know what this novel power she was wielding did, she should've tested it. I am quite certain she did know, though, because she alludes in the EW cutscene to man no longer flying but walking. So I think she had an inkling of what it'd so. It only makes the difference between negligent and intentional manslaughter in the end...

You literally rejoin with Ardbert, and Emet saw a vision of your whole soul. The Rejoining itself is what they were doing to bring back all of the ancients, which means they weren't gone...

On this logic, what's the objection to it? If we're going to overlook the fact that the ancient would have had to physically die to become sundered (implied by the reduction in their lifespans alone - really, the differences in life forms are drastic but for some reason this is being ignored), and that the sundered will physically die to be rejoined, then surely neither act is a problem?

The story in Endwalker is lackluster if you have taken any Philosophy 101 class or read any philosophical books. I do not understand why some people are so obsessed with Friedrich Nietzsche, Nihilism, and Existentialism. It almost feels like Deus Ex Machina in terms of another villain coming out of nowhere invalidating the previous plot too.

I like the parts where they tried to make you care about the other Scions, the artistic setting, and what emotional formula they were trying to convey to the player. The logical part of my brain just cannot accept the plot holes and lack of rationale thought by the character's actions and belief systems. The story and plot just became melodramatic fluff to me.

Same for me.

The collateral damage is what's important in this case. I only brought up the idea of excessive force in referencing concept of unwarranted defense generally.

Though if you wanted to be picky about it, it's bizarre and excessive in retrospect that Hydaelyn sundered the world into 14 parts instead of just, like, 2, presumably causing far greater damage to the selfhood of the people currently living on the planet as a result. We beat Meteion while 9/14 rejoined, so that would have been fine.

The worst thing about it is that it means that singular solution, sundering, could've been implemented more selectively (i.e. on a subset of the population) if other solutions were not found, with the agreement of her people if they had been given the full story. Really, the reason she had to sunder the entire world is she wasn't being forthcoming with her goals, so naturally Zodiark got in her way and he was so much more powerful that she couldn't defeat him without dragging the entire star into it, as per her own admission. I get the impression that this is why she concedes the sundering was neither kind nor just.