What's the point with that quite lackluster story in Endwalker?

[linayar]

I would've taken action in the past.

And in the process, lose everything that the WoL knew and cared about.

She openly stated she would let time repeat itself, thus withholding information from her fellow ancients. Newfound information that might stop the final days from ever happening.

Of course, that's one theory. What we instead received was an explanation we were forced to accept. She gambled on what some of us here would deem a lesser or immoral option.

Yes, in essence, she has hope on the WoL. It would've been terrible to answer that hope by fighting her for no benefit to the WoL.

I think they're referring to how Hydaelyn's backup plan would be for the people of Etheirys to flee elsewhere, which would lead to Meteion destroying the world and thereby the other reflections of Etheirys. Thancred, notably, was not entertaining the possibility of not fighting Meteion because he was worried about Ryne.

That said, if Hydaelyn is tapped out on power and the Warrior of Light can't defeat Meteion, I'm not really sure what else the backup plan could be. It's clear Hydaelyn would prefer that they can defeat Meteion, but she left an out for the people of the Source so that SOMETHING could survive in the event that result wasn't possible.

By fleeing, Meteion wouldn't have anything to do with the Source. If anything, that would've saved the shards, at least until Meteion finds them again. But that's why it's a last resort. It's meant to prolong their chance of survival.

[Stachiko]

And in the process, lose everything that the WoL knew and cared about.

Her decision could have caused that anyways. Time loops are not easy to write around. EW dealt with it poorly.

That's not necessarily my point though. She took it all upon herself to dictate the fate for all of mankind. There's a certain negligence to that. A certain horrifying realization.

[linayar]

1.Her backup plan involved fleeing the source, which means once Meteion destroyed it, all the shards would cease to exist. She would destroy it, as she was essentially destroying everything in her path at that point. Even the scions acknowledge it would happen and that they wouldnt leave the shards behind.

We don't actually know what she would do. That was just a conversation between the Scions and the Loporrits. Her actions so far were against the people of the Source, not the planet itself.

2.They acknowledged that in messing with time they could cause their own timeline to cease to exist,everyone in that timeline would be dead, and they still went along with it.

Indeed, but they were also already dying, and it seemed the end was near anyway. Regardless, just like I have no reason to be against the Ancients, I have no reason to be against them. My problem is with the Ascians, and regardless of what Venat did, she did not make them try to kill the WoL and the people we know.

3.Thats fine, its your opinion, however i personally find it extremely hypocritical based on the themes the writers have been pushing constantly.

Well, I disagree with the interpretation of how those themes were represented in the story. For one, at no point in explaining the reasoning of the Ascians did they ever try to make them the good guys, so any problem you may have with Venat has nothing to do with the fact of the Ascians and the WoL's current situation.

4.The cutscene we saw was a recording was it not? Stands to reason it was an accurate representation. They didnt even know they were going to die and be sacrificed as they lament the loss of Venat. If they knew they were being sacrificed why would they lament losing her? They'd be dead.

In the end. all of this could've bene avoided if she had just simply gave her knowledge to others and formulated a plan instead of giving up on them and placing her trust in someone she had only just met.

I don't think it was ever stated one way or another. It's also not in context, unless you think Venat just walk by Emet without Emet trying to get her to help.

Her decision could have caused that anyways. Time loops are not easy to write around. EW dealt with it poorly.

That's not necessarily my point though. She took it all upon herself to dictate the fate for all of mankind. There's a certain negligence to that. A certain horrifying realization.

It is indeed not easy to write about time loop, but we know that the Ancients never figured out the cause, so it's not within reason to allow Venat to make her choice of keeping silent due to her explanation.

There's a certain negligence in going back in time in the first place. We were told not to interfere, and yet not only did we interfere, we told them about the situation.

[Stachiko]

due to her explanation.

Exactly. She spoon fed us an explanation and our character accepted it regardless. I would've personally asked her 100 million questions and possibly caused the end of all Etheirys as we know it. Spose my FFXIV game should all be glad I'm not personally the WoL.

There's a certain negligence in going back in time in the first place. We were told not to interfere, and yet not only did we interfere, we told them about the situation.

I must've been half awake when I read the parts leading up to Elidibus sending us back. I don't recall any major mentions of time consequences or hesitation to take action. Mind you, at that point I was also moderately done with the story.

I'll take your word for it. Even then, at least it was a group decision (Which I also wouldn't consider sufficient enough people to make a decision).

[linayar]

I love this response- it is both critical of me while acknowledging our mediocrity. You win.

Yeah, when you don't consider mediocrity as a negative or a loss, you tend to win more often.

Exactly. She spoon fed us an explanation and our character accepted it regardless. I would've personally asked her 100 million questions and possibly caused the end of all Etheirys as we know it. Spose my FFXIV game should all be glad I'm not personally the WoL.

She had an explanation, and given what we know of the present, her explanation makes sense.

I must've been half awake when I read the parts leading up to Elidibus sending us back. I don't recall any major mentions of time consequences or hesitation to take action. Mind you, at that point I was also moderately done with the story.

I'll take your word for it. Even then, at least it was a group decision (Which I also wouldn't consider sufficient enough people to make a decision).

It wasn't a group decision. It was just us deciding to tell them.