All of which is fair. And hopefully you also don't come onto the forums and demand people learn everything before getting in an instance. I won't ever go so far as to say everyone is receptive and wonderful. There's cruddy people in this game just like any other and the influx of players has made it more common to encounter them just through sheer numbers.
not said directly but this example given basically says a huge increase in players without increasing the "good" players. By extrapolation that means ONLY increasing the bad players:
I said :
in response to:but it's been my experience that immediately after someone calls out "coddling" players they start to talk about how people attack them for criticizing those players in a harsh manner and/or immediately start to level unnecessarily rude or derogatory criticism demonstrating my point that they don't actually have a problem with other players needing to learn, but being mad they cannot denigrate or shame people into learning.
and then:
in response to :I don't assume people are mad, I notice that the people who GET mad are the ones teaching in said "Blunt" or "matter of fact" methods. You don't need to sugar coat things, but you should probably use tact when dealing with unknown randoms. If you think bare minimum tact is unnecessary "inflation" then you're probably exactly who I am talking about.
The first says it reinforces the perception that they're mad they can't use their preferred derogatory tactics since they express frustration through FURTHER denigration.
The 2nd says I don't assume EVERYONE is just mad I observe the people who say things in "unsugared" ways are the ones who are quickest to GET PERCEPTIBLY MAD.
I don't see how you can think one relates to the other. Seeing people get mad, does not mean I assumed anything. None of that is opposing.



Reply With Quote

