

Strongly disagree but you do you. I think it is one of worse versions of smn in the game so far. Right next to 2.0 damn in terms of gameplay. Maybe worse because 2.0 smn had stuff to manage and keep track of


I personally liked 2.0 SMN, it was pretty rewarding to play.
The best smn is IMO
4.0 > 3.0 > 2.0 > 5.0 > 6.0
Last edited by Sunako; 12-31-2021 at 01:35 AM.


Oh don't me wrong I loved 2.0 smn. I think 3.0 was a lot better.
Two class fantasies I love are dots and summoning. Why I liked 4.x smn, it was a good mixed of the two.
HW>StB>ShB>ARR>>>>>>EW
I'm just some guy...



I'm more along the lines of 4.0 > 5.0 > 2.0 > 3.0 >6.0
I do think 5.0 did add some good things like defined roles for Garuda and Ifrit, but overall the rotation and design was a step back from 4.0. 3.0 I always held firm to the belief that players wanted to summon Bahamut, not Bahamut's Breath.


I personally liked Aetherflow system the most about summoner and they ruined it during 5.0 , that's why I hated 5.0 changes.I'm more along the lines of 4.0 > 5.0 > 2.0 > 3.0 >6.0
I do think 5.0 did add some good things like defined roles for Garuda and Ifrit, but overall the rotation and design was a step back from 4.0. 3.0 I always held firm to the belief that players wanted to summon Bahamut, not Bahamut's Breath.


Last edited by zcrash970; 12-31-2021 at 05:40 AM.
I'm just some guy...
Which is ironic, because pre-EW SMN was the worst version of SMN in Final Fantasy history. lol
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



