Lazy design?
First off, legit every non-lala female is an altered Midlander, so they were always gonna be based on that. Accepting that Roe are described as the "largest, most rugged" race easily puts things in perspective to me. Any "less rugged" version of Femroe is gonna look like a female that's in the game already.
Secondly, let's run down the list of added player models ...
Au Ra- Males= Taller Fixed Elezen/ Females= Updated Shorter Miqote
Viera- Males= Updated taller Miqote/ Females= Shorter Fixed Elezen
Hrothgar Males= Shorter Fixed Roe
Everything added to this game is based on something else because it's smart and efficient. MV isn't some bold move either, they just took the most popular male body in the game, updated it and made it as tall as the 2nd most popular male in the game. As shown with Au Ra they don't GAF about making genders "match" and they've yet to make a race be full on "X race but better". So I guessed a long time ago that Hrothgals would be [insert any non-Femroe female] updated and made taller.
3rdly, IDK who looks at this data, knowing that most of a new race is converts, and thinks "we should triple down on the muscle women".
Before ShB, RoeBros were easily over twice of Femroe's numbers ... they were the only males to decrease in popularity in ShB because so many converted to Hrothgar. There's nearly 200k female Miqote, it makes utter sense to try to eat at that population over eating the choice that accounts for only 1% of active players, and the only way you do that is by giving them something they would want to play. So yeah, I get exactly why Hrothgals look like taller Miqote/ updated Mithra in that art, and I can't fault them for that. It makes far more sense, and no amount of internet gold stars for making an option you know would result in less than 0.5% of the player base being happy is gonna make up for the colossal amount of effort that goes into it.
----------------
IDK ... the more time passes, the more I be feeling like a prophet in these streets.
Like over a year ago, people were getting on my ass for pointing out that if they made MV and Hrohgals they would likely not have the same head limitations as the current genders because that was a stupid core design decision that need not be repeated. Laughed at for suggesting Hrothgals have the ability to change hair without paying $10. To me, it would be asinine to ignore ALL the negative backlash this hair **** has gotten since even before ShB came out JUST to keep things "fair", but people assumed they would keep it evens-Stevens OR that female Viera would get some in EW and MV would release with only race hair, having to wait 2 years like the females for more. Fast-forward to now, and they are finally giving Viera some hair after working to make that easier ... yet reaffirms that they aint getting a large selection.
MV? Oh, they were made with not limits in that regard. We know that they're working on a way for Hrothgar to select between their head's styles for 6.1, wouldn't be shocked if Hrothgals are like MV in this regard and are made to have reg ol hair support.
We saw the Mural and I pointed out how Hrothgals had a face that was very ... Avatar/ Bless cat races/ That-ONE-popular-Female-Ronso-art like. Very humanized, which interested me as my artist bones can tell it's easy AF to make a generic cat face in the style that mural is, yet they didn't. Was laughed at yet here we are, finalized Queen art looks exactly like that mural (and that mural is in fact canon art that's in the game).
We'll see what they look like in game (hoping for a cheeky 6.0 Hrothgal character myself) but I'm feeling confident that I see what's happening, and it makes sense for the reasons I just listed.



Reply With Quote






