Quote Originally Posted by IckeDerTyp View Post
What's SE supposed to do? Remove their claim on the houses? Ban them?

Who says you're not next if they do that?

More supply is the only actual solution. Atleast in my head! I doubt the lottery system is gonna change much either.

But never say never! ^^
More supply isn't viable when not only does it require more hardware in a time where there's a literal shortage and even a million dollar company can't magic up infinite amounts of servers, space to secure them and people to maintain them but people will continue to use alts to bypass the rules as long as the rules aren't well clarified and enforced. If square isn't going to add instanced housing then they need to better define the rules for housing to prevent this "technically not breaking any rules" garbage people use to do things that were clearly not intended by a system that assumed everyone would be playing in good faith.

As for the scare tactic of "who says you're not next?"
Well if there's twenty people in a room and a plate of ten cookies - then yes I'd say we start slapping the hands of people who reach for three or four cookies entirely for themselves first. And maybe start telling off those who pay their friends to get them two or three more cookies so they're the only ones who can get any while most of the people hanging out can't even get one crumb. Is the problem with the core system of whatever jerk only gave twenty people ten cookies? Yes. Of course. But the least people could do is not abuse a bad system. The absolute least.

If you do something cruel or selfish and your only defense is "Well the rules don't say I can't pee in the pool, everyone else does it!" Then you're probably not standing on solid ground to begin with.