SECOND Job Stones for base classes of ARR?

[Tonkra]

They won't do this as they regretted doing so with summoner and Scholar. As they've been trying to separate them or make them different since the day they felt it was a mistake.

Thats an old statement from back then when we had a lv 50 / lv 60 cap.

Now from lv 30 on when you obtain the job stone until lv 80 (next expansion lv 90) there are a lot levels and skills to go to make them feel very very different..
I guess you cant compare SCH with SMN now anymore. Even the DoT spells from summoner have been scratched.. so..

And i guess it would be pretty nice (since there are a tons of classes to level) to have multiple situations like with arcanist where you level two classes at the same time and you are able switch practically from a damage dealer (SMN) to a healer (scholar).


I mean how amazing would it be to switch from a warrior tank role to a dps role like beastmaster pet dps (or a berserker) or the other way around. especially if a player wouldnt ever level up a warrior for example.
This would also increase the playerbase of tanks significantly i'd guess, too.

Dont see always the negatives.

[DragoAskani]

Thats an old statement from back then when we had a lv 50 / lv 60 cap.

Now from lv 30 on when you obtain the job stone until lv 80 (next expansion lv 90) there are a lot levels and skills to go to make them feel very very different..
I guess you cant compare SCH with SMN now anymore. Even the DoT spells from summoner have been scratched.. so..

And i guess it would be pretty nice (since there are a tons of classes to level) to have multiple situations like with arcanist where you level two classes at the same time and you are able switch practically from a damage dealer (SMN) to a healer (scholar).


I mean how amazing would it be to switch from a warrior tank role to a dps role like beastmaster pet dps (or a berserker) or the other way around. especially if a player wouldnt ever level up a warrior for example.
This would also increase the playerbase of tanks significantly i'd guess, too.

Dont see always the negatives.

Not as old as you think. It was commented on by yoshi p in this interview before shadowbringers: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...bgWq3Km_I/edit

I can't copy and paste out of the document cause they locked that. But part of the interview that touches on this is question 3s answer by yoshi p.

[Tonkra]

Not as old as you think. It was commented on by yoshi p in this interview before shadowbringers: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...bgWq3Km_I/edit

I can't copy and paste out of the document cause they locked that. But part of the interview that touches on this is question 3s answer by yoshi p.

See, do you know what i dont understand in many posts in this forum nowdays? "yoshi p. said" or: "they didnt do it for a reason".
1.0. was also "done for a reason" by the team. We gave feedback (including me - since i play since 1.0. Beta) and the game became better.

Also like changing the egis into the real avatar / summons, which was requested by me and others.
Which was excused way earlier on with arguments like: "blabla summoners cant summon the real summons because its against the lore - they are gods" Of course they dont summon the original summons, they are summoning just the copies / avatars of them.

So with your argumentation now... we would never see the summoner get rid of the egis and getting the real summons with Endwalker. I guess the feedback of the players was great so far (the trailer of job actions for summoner).



So now.. i personally would like the idea just to level a warrior and being able to switch from tank over to a dps job like Beastmaster (since we are missing also pet classes).
Because i dont know how much time you have to level classes up, but i like the idea to have shared exp bars like SMN/SCH have, so that i dont have to level up 8 other job classes.
We have a huge amount of content in this game which is still extemely growing, i think it would be a clever move.


So do you dislike the idea to have a beastmaster job on maurader or a ranger job on the archer class, then for what reason. Or is it just because "someone said"?
Thats no argument for me personally. And its pretty annoying to read it all over again on this forum here (the team said, Yoshi P. said)..
Yes he said also we wont get to summon garuda and titan. And here we are.

its just a suggestion and no critique, so pls chill fangirls / boys. I am pretty sure Yoshi. P and his team is fine with discussions like that..

My 2 Cents, and thank you.

[DragoAskani]

See, do you know what i dont understand in many posts in this forum nowdays? "yoshi p. said" or: "they didnt do it for a reason".
1.0. was also "done for a reason" by the team. We gave feedback (including me - since i play since 1.0. Beta) and the game became better.

Also like changing the egis into the real avatar / summons, which was requested by me and others.
Which was excused way earlier on with arguments like: "blabla summoners cant summon the real summons because its against the lore - they are gods" Of course they dont summon the original summons, they are summoning just the copies / avatars of them.

So with your argumentation now... we would never see the summoner get rid of the egis and getting the real summons with Endwalker. I guess the feedback of the players was great so far (the trailer of job actions for summoner).



So now.. i personally would like the idea just to level a warrior and being able to switch from tank over to a dps job like Beastmaster (since we are missing also pet classes).
Because i dont know how much time you have to level classes up, but i like the idea to have shared exp bars like SMN/SCH have, so that i dont have to level up 8 other job classes.
We have a huge amount of content in this game which is still extemely growing, i think it would be a clever move.


So do you dislike the idea to have a beastmaster job on maurader or a ranger job on the archer class, then for what reason. Or is it just because "someone said"?
Thats no argument for me personally. And its pretty annoying to read it all over again on this forum here (the team said, Yoshi P. said)..
Yes he said also we wont get to summon garuda and titan. And here we are.

its just a suggestion and no critique, so pls chill fangirls / boys. I am pretty sure Yoshi. P and his team is fine with discussions like that..

My 2 Cents, and thank you.

What argumentation? I didn't say I agree'd or disagree'd so stop projecting and read what I said LITERALLY. I just pointed out that the comment that it was something they said when we had a 50/60 level cap is indeed false. I love how you are telling me to chill, while making up all these things in your head from my 4. FOUR. Basic sentences. Again stop projecting, and trying to make my comment out to be more then just correcting you on your statement.