So, new hair coming out... Just...

[Vallaresi]

A guarantee?!!! Where did you get that information from?

There's absolutely no official standpoint on this matter.

You do not have any references to back up your claim because - guess what - you just made them on your mind!

They should really put out a new statement regarding female Viera hair. Hrothgar is a separate race with a design choice where the hair is selected along with the face.
If it's any consolation, once male Viera comes out they will never treat female Viera and male Hrothgar as one race. Once this happens they can start letting the Viera race (male and female) get old hairstyles from mogstation, seasonal events, and possibly even level 1 hats and artifact hats/helmets.
It's not easy waiting until Endwalker but they will fix the hair situation, that's a guarantee.

As for the topic at hand; I'll repeat, they will fix the hair situation sometime in Endwalker. I can't say it'll be 6.0 when Endwalker comes out, but I can almost guarantee that it'll be by 6.1. As much as they love everything to be a marketing surprise for Live Letters, etc, this issue with the hairstyles for female Viera really stings for them.

I understand pre-Shadowbringers hairstyles, but patch 5.5 is adding a new hairstyle and they can't use it, ouch.

Amnmaat didn't say he can guarantee anything. That is a blatant misreading of what he said and thus a strawman. He said he can give an "almost guarantee," which expresses nothing but strong belief. That you think this is "real facts and logics" or the words of a "real internet debater" is really just adding evidence of you finding appeal in faulty argumentation and bad faith social engagement. When you actually correctly read what he said, he made no claims of guarantees, but instead expressed strong belief that there would be hairs added by 6.1. In which, that's nothing really to criticize. I personally do not share in his belief given how these last 2 years were like in regard to the matter, but I also understand some people like to be rather optimistic. Regardless, I find the aggression and ill tactics aimed at him to be in poor taste and even poorer ethics.

Oh sweetie... I even grabbed his previous comments for your reading pleasure and, also, according to the dictionary:

- To guarantee is to promise with certainty and
- A belief is an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof.

So we get two different concepts here; better pick one that better suits your rationale right? I'm not discussing semantics with you any further.

If someone is coming here to guarantee whatever, better be prepared to back up the claim as a normal person does.

[Yandere-chan]

Oh sweetie... I even grabbed his previous comments for your reading pleasure and, also, according to the dictionary:

- To guarantee is to promise with certainty and
- A belief is an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof.

So we get two different concepts here; better pick one that better suits your rationale right? I'm not discussing semantics with you any further.

If someone is coming here to guarantee whatever, better be prepared to back up the claim as a normal person does.

The first post of his isn't the one you quoted in your reply to him. The second one was, which is his latest post on the matter, in which he clarifies it's an "almost guarantee." You can't in good faith exclude the modifier of a word to single out that word to make your point as that is misrepresenting what the person says. It's literally deception and misrepresentation. It's not even a question of semantics. That's like going to someone who says, "I hardly miss him," removing the hardly modifier, and acting if the person said they missed him. It completely changes what the person conveyed. Just like here, an almost guarantee means he can't quite guarantee it, but it's so likely in his belief that he can almost guarantee it. The word almost is not some meaningless word that you can just toss out because it's convientant for you to do so to respond harshly to him. If you are posting in good faith, I'm sure you can understand that.