Quote Originally Posted by TurtlesAWD View Post
As it happens, I'd say what I generally want to do is play the game and interact with other people fairly and equitably. I mostly trust myself to do this. I imagine a ToS will generally line up with that and can likewise be mostly trusted to represent a fair set of agreements for people to abide by. But let's not pretend these are commandments handed down from god, or moral absolutes argued from first principles, or that unpredicted cases can't arise - and let's not pretend like this thread's decision on what the ToS says is the correct interpretation as a consequence of this thread being in agreement with itself. If there was a subset of players who required a tool excluded by definition due to a disability, that would be better if it were changed - or ignored because the needs of players in that case outweigh the value in obedience to a rule which would consequently exclude them from normal play.
what you are ignoring, is that tools used for accessibility, and not typically used to automate gameplay, they are used to allow gameplay to the same level as someone without a disability.

your argument in this direction is flawed.

use of third party software to gain an advantage over people who are going about their "fair and equitable" gameplay is cheating.

cheating is generally considered by most, aside from yourself and a few others who feel rules dont apply to them, to be bad.

sorry, you have not come up with any applicable examples to convince me that cheating is good for anyone but the cheater.