Results -9 to 0 of 3534

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player

    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    211
    Quote Originally Posted by Klb600 View Post
    This. Earlier in the thread people suggested the idea of "all or nothing" as well, such that would be users of this feature would lose access to the glamour feature themselves(essentially penalization for a QoL feature that impacts nobody), now a marker suggestion to label would be "bigots and intolerant" people.

    Seems like a whole lot of passive aggression for a feature that at the end of the day affects no one in any tangible or measurable manner, you can make the $$$ argument, or the Technical limitation argument, but if you want to equate the "Rights" of a human to a what is essentially Bits and HEX, that's a you problem.
    To be fair.. this whole thread is nothing but passive aggression. I feel like everyone here were trolled massively because the TC hasn't came here once after they made this topic. It seriously feels like this was nothing but a massive trolled that got everyone in arms. And sadly it worked. And a maker wouldn't label you that. It'll just be an icon that lets other people know you have it on. And if they don't want to be effected the icon lets them know not to party with you. Whats wrong with that? Why do you get a feature and not the other side? Why be unfair? Whats wrong with an icon?

    You act like people wouldn't already find ways to find out if you're using it or not anyway.
    (6)
    Last edited by Canada_bangs; 05-05-2020 at 05:01 AM.