Quote Originally Posted by linay View Post
If someone says that they've bought the game/expansion or paid the subscription fee and uses that as an argument for why they should not have to make additional purchase, then they are making an entitlement claim.

An argument for why something should exist is only necessary if it doesn't exist. The store already exists.

Well, your opinion is wrong because the very first post in this thread stated the point:

So it is very much on point to argue if that sense of entitlement is misplaced (not that it's always the case).
I still see it as an opinion and feedback. The feedback and criticism is that there shouldn't be such Cash Shop in a game where you already pay for sub, and if there is, they are dissatisfied.

I get that it technically is a sense of entitlement, but what I'm basically trying to say is that the counterargument of "you aren't entitled to anything" as response to this is pointless, what's the even the point of giving your opinion or feedback then? You can ultimately respond that way to any kind of criticism. SE does what it wants in the end of the day and everybody is aware of that, the only way we "threaten" SE is by leaving the game, if its shown that we are dissatisfied there's a higher chance we leave the game.

You get what I mean? It's not so much about the technicality of this being about entitlement or not, but rather what is or isn't a productive argument for the discussion.