Limited Job #2: Beastmaster

[jon041065]

It'll take a considerable amount of resources to give every job a limited aspect just to accommodate one or eventually two limited-exclusive jobs, and there's no good reason to do so. Reverse it so limited jobs have full versions and it would be less work, but I think it's just more efficient to make them full jobs flat out or else the devs will just show how deaf they are to criticism that's been said since the reveal of the concept.

I didn't say to add a limited version of every job.

I'm definitely against limited jobS but was for the idea of there being a single one such as onion knight/freelancer. I won't deny though that some do want the side content aspect of what "limited" BST could bring. To me the idea of tying a job to this type of content is a bad idea but not the content itself. So I say do both which yes would require resources but at least SE would know that such side content would have a better reception than some of their past ideas.

[dinnertime]

I didn't say to add a limited version of every job.

I'm definitely against limited jobS but was for the idea of there being a single one such as onion knight/freelancer. I won't deny though that some do want the side content aspect of what "limited" BST could bring. To me the idea of tying a job to this type of content is a bad idea but not the content itself. So I say do both which yes would require resources but at least SE would know that such side content would have a better reception than some of their past ideas.

Sorry, when you said "Make the "limited" aspect of BST something any job can do" I thought that's what you meant, but I can see that working out. Maybe.