Results 1 to 10 of 37

Hybrid View

  1. 01-08-2020 04:02 AM #1
    Bright-Flower
    Player
    Bright-Flower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,828
    Character
    Nyr Ardyne
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    Nope. While I'm glad tank stances no longer have the +def -dps aspect to them, we should keep the enmity stance. It's a useful tool to toggle as an OT so that I stay behind the MT but above the rest of the party on enmity, so that if the MT goes down I have enmity, without having to either hold back dps or risk pulling threat by accident.
    (1)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 01-08-2020 03:38 PM #2
    MerlinCross
    Player
    MerlinCross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    387
    Character
    Lavitz Orlandeau
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Samurai Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Bright-Flower View Post
    Nope. While I'm glad tank stances no longer have the +def -dps aspect to them, we should keep the enmity stance. It's a useful tool to toggle as an OT so that I stay behind the MT but above the rest of the party on enmity, so that if the MT goes down I have enmity, without having to either hold back dps or risk pulling threat by accident.
    That seems a lot of work/effort when Stance+Provoke is a thing.

    On topic, maybe just give tanks higher aggro so they can stay second in threat and have MT turn on the Stance?
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »