Quote Originally Posted by HawkHellfire View Post
This is a terrible idea Square. 24 man PVP were actually FUN because you had to use strategy. You had to think about where to send people and how many to send. 72 man is literally a zerg fest. It's not fun. There's no strategy. In 24 man, you could solo snipe a base and usually be confronted by 1 or 2 other people, and if you're good, you can survive and claim victory. You know...it's PVP afterall. In 72 man, I don't how good you are, you won't survive a rush of 15 morons that don't know how to play and are just there to get exp or tomes. It's NOT fun. It's like you don't care about your players (keep in mind we are PAYING you to play this) so you just remove the essence of one of your game modes. First you remove the point of PVP rank to make everything vanilla. Now you are removing the best way to actually play PVP. Instead of thinking outside the box you are just figuring out the best way to screw over your paying fanbase and doing that. How come you don't screw over the other gamers like you do PVP. If you remove 24 man PVP you may as well turn all savage raids into 72 man zerg fests and nerf the bosses hp by 80%. What? You say you won't do that because it will kill the point of savage content? THEN STOP KILLING PVP CONTENT FOR THOSE OF US THAT LIKE PVP. Otherwise at least reduce our monthly fee to $5 a month or something.
FWIW (which isn't much), it would be nice if they had larger teams versions of things like FL and Feast for casuals, new players, and those exploring PvP, then tighter and more competitive formats with smaller teams for those who get into PvP more intensely. Picture, for example, seasons and ranking for 8 player teams in FL. Dunno, might not work but it would draw a distinction of seriousness between the formats.