More I think about it 5.0 doesn't seem like 'Healers Big Balance' patch and more like 'Balance's Big Balance' patch. It sure seems that way going by how little they've disclosed about anything else for SCH and healers in general.all the Healers could of kept all their original spells, and allow them to upgrade into new spells using traits. it just proves they are running out of ideas or saving them till we're all capped at LV99. Six years and the only new role action they came up with was RESCUE. for the rest, i can understand the ESUNA, SWIFTCAST, and LUCID DREAMING thing they want to save time/resources for when they add a new healer. Do i hate this? YES I DO. Because i been SCH/WHM/ since 2.0 2013 and an AST since 3.0 2015 and Nostalgia is one hell of a drug. for the rest, REPOSE is garbage, and i have a feeling they know how we feel about REPOSE! i would rather have back CLERIC STANCE atleast i will feel like i can use all my Role Actions. Also can we please buff SURECAST, 6s duration but 120s recast, can we raise this to 12s duriation.
All i know is come this next live letter, lets us now about job changes coming, its cool they want to interview they new 24 man Nier team. but people who play want answers on what they plan on doing with jobs under performing and jobs that are mad boring to play. HOPEFULLY when the smoke is cleared, jobs are fixed and people give back positive feedback on what they changed, they don't back track on it when 6.0 drops. wishful thinking since SE loves back tracking on things.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote


