Quote Originally Posted by darkstarpoet1 View Post
i just have a question. i see one group telling someone to wait until something is put in to judge it and then say what they think, but when they do that the same group says well you should have said something sooner.
I've never seen this -- Logic and common sense dictates you can't judge a book by it's cover, this is how things are more likely to end up a way you don't want if you preemptively complain about something because they could end up fixing what isn't broken but that wouldn't be known because a group of people complained just from the concept and not implementation.

It reminds me of when burger places started to introduce "weird" burger ideas and how people complained a hamburger shouldn't have x,y,z on it, yet it ended up becoming staples in most burger places because when they finally experienced it, it wasn't this sin against humanity they made it out to be just from hearing about it.

they have to express concerns at one point or another.
You express concerns after you have it in your hands, you can't say "this doesn't work" because of what you assume on how it works or will work or will affect things. It's fine to speak up about problems, but how can you consider something a problem when you can't even experience it? Don't people refer to that as complaining for the sake of it? Going back to the burger example, it's like complaining your burger was undercooked before you even see the damn thing let alone taste it lol.