Tactful ways to inform people that they're playing badly?

[Awha]

Because unless someone is actually preventing the completion of the run and refusing to take advice that would allow them to compete it I don’t think they should be removed from content, and even if it takes them a few tries to learn the mechs of a boss battle that’s totally fine too as long as they are communicating and trying.

For example, I’m trying to get all jobs to 80 for my amaro mount, I’ve been in a lot, and I mean a lot of parties where the tank could pull large but they don’t, would I love to have big pulls and be done a bit faster? Sure, but the thought to remove them has never crossed my mind, I’m not more important or more significant than they are so I just deal with it and take a few minutes longer to complete the duty.

Oh I agree that no one person on a 1:1 is more important the another, what I am saying is vote kicks are not based around one person it requires the a majority of those able to vote to pass. So this is where my question lays if the vote passes to remove another player for being new or less skilled how is that bad? At that point it could be seen as a fact that the vote passed which means majority of the group did not want to play with said person for whatever reason.

Overall maybe I am mixing up what people are trying to say. I have no issue with people not approving of action, more so confused as to why they refer to the action as bad. I tend to differentiate the two, just because I do not like something does not mean I think it is bad. Though I could very well using them in the wrong context now that go back and read the responses over again.