And in 1.20b we'll have...

[AarosLunos]

I'm not against new classes but I seriously doubt SE will add a new class just to justify a little present for people who stuck around when they started charging a subscription fee.

Except for the fact that SE has stated numerous times that they plan on implementing pet classes. Its not necessarily because of the mount, but I'm sure the lore will have tie ins. Seriously people need to stop arguing over semantics and do a little research first.

[Altareon]

Except for the fact that SE has stated numerous times that they plan on implementing pet classes. Its not necessarily because of the mount, but I'm sure the lore will have tie ins. Seriously people need to stop arguing over semantics and do a little research first.

Of course they will but by the time they get around to adding new classes this Gobbue thing will be long forgotten. My point was they're not going to add a new class alongside the mount just to justify it in the lore.

[Elexia]

Of course they will but by the time they get around to adding new classes this Gobbue thing will be long forgotten. My point was they're not going to add a new class alongside the mount just to justify it in the lore.

Except it wouldn't have been added to "justify" the lore, it would have been a part of the class's abilities. Though SE could go the route and turn everyone into a pet class if you want to talk about justifying something.

[Altareon]

Except it wouldn't have been added to "justify" the lore, it would have been a part of the class's abilities. Though SE could go the route and turn everyone into a pet class if you want to talk about justifying something.

You have yet to properly explain why Chocobos can't be wild when that has been a well established trope in Final Fantasy and why it's completely unacceptable, in light of that, that you can't have a tamed Gobbue as a mount.
Or can I just count that as you don't have a good explanation for that and just hate it because it's a new idea in a Final Fantasy?