Quote Originally Posted by Lauront View Post
Sorry but I don't think you're grasping what I am saying. They are a profit-seeking enterprise. Not a charity. You are solely focusing on one single issue to the detriment of everything else. Money IS an obstacle if the feature's addition would cost them on net, which it could if demand doesn't cover the costs of any possible solution that they devise. I am not disputing that there is a "root problem" (which as I said, amounts to the costs; he is just saying they cannot be reduced in a straightforward manner, not that they're not the issue); what I am disputing is that they will consider adding them if the feature is detrimental to their revenues.

I am thus satisfied with how I phrased the question.
I understand exactly what you're saying mate.
But Im starting to believe the root of THIS issue here, is you literally think it is a money issue. If you think they need a financial incentive to solve an issue, and that commercial success of the Expansion might lead to solving the issue, then that as a whole means $$$ = Problem solved.
And I feel the need to remind you that YoshiP himself has already said ""Its not an issue that can be solved by throwing money at it"" So reading your post, it sounds like your convinced its a money issue, Or that more money will solve the issue.

Feel free to correct me here. It could just be how your wording stuff, because how Im reading you, it all seems to come back to 'Money'
Which I feel might get your question overlooked, because thats already been addressed.