Anyone know if blocking mitigation has been increased from 20%?

[Kyni]

Its not though unless you ignore the damage reduction from armor/magic resist. The more armor/magic resist you have, the lower the EHP value of other % damage reductions due to multiplicative reduction. TBN double dips in EHP gain due to both health and armor/magic resist, while the EPH of every other cooldown is dependent on health.

Effective health is just a measurement for how much dmg can you take without healing or lucky dodges or the like. TBN increases this number by a factor of 1.25, when used, Sheltron does too. Defence (and Tank mastery) also just provide another factor for the multiplication. The only thing currently in the game that forces you to treat TBN differently than Sheltron ( or rather any percentage based mitigation) are absorb shields and those have no interaction with TBN, but do profit from stuff like Sheltron ( because the 20% through block works for them too).

In addition to that, because all tanks have the same passive always on mitigation, you can make your life easier by, in fact just ignoring those and just taking the non cd mitigated attacks of bosses. You would have to math in those to gain the completely unmitigated attack values and would then just remove them again when actually comparing. That's just useless busywork.

Let me guess Divine Veil is working as intended too?

so is cover? oh and Passage of Arms as well then. Oh maybe clemency as well. What do they all have in common? PLD loses in every scenario. You either get no shield, Lose gauge for some niche trash ability, lose GCD and Lose some more GCD, something no other tank has to deal with. Spare me the working as intended Bullshit, Sheltron is only stronger than HoS but thats not saying much since HoS will most likely get buffed anyways or can be paired with an additional mitigation such as camo which PLD doesn't get anyways.[/QUOTE]

Calling the best mitigation ability for non tank targets, a nice trash ability is a bit underselling cover. Considering that the other tanks don't even have something that really compares. Closest thing would be TBN, but even that's stretching it.

The trigger condition for DV and the channelling for PoA is not that great I agree. They are still the 2 strongest raid wide mitigation cooldowns of the tanks. The no self shield on DV has practical no impact on anything, if there is raid wide dmg(for what these skills are designed for) that kills you, a tank, without the 13k shield, the only one standing would be the other tank. The same applies for PoA and in this case you can even sue it for personal use, if you want to conserve gauge, so I think changing it to also give you the 15% dmg reduction instead of the guaranteed block would be more of a nerf than a buff under most conditions. If you really need extra mitigation have the other tank throw his ot help cd on you.

In case of clemency you really wont like my answer. Clemency is borderline broken and overpowered. Being able to throw out a heal, that is on par if not stronger than a lot of Healer spells and that heals you for a non trivial portion of the amount healed too, without it having a cooldown attached to it is very strong in progression. It's comparable, although it is notable less useful, to RDM ability to instant ress and I think you know how that works out balance wise for those. Yes it's not very useful in speed kill scenarios, but not everything is about those. Besides even then, if you have a WHM who can use one more glare instead of having to use cure 2, it's a very small rdps gain. The last thing is arguable a bit problematic in and off itself.

It's true that the other tanks don't have to deal with these specific problems, but they have problems of their own. Onslaught, a gap closer, being a dps loss and through this the only gap closer that only gets used as a gap closer, TBN having to break it being a 500 potency loss and on GNB it's really awkward to use def cds during your burst window, because of the amount of double weaving you have to do to not unsyc your cooldowns. And yes these aren't big problems, but neither are the ones you mentioned.

Getting crit during a sheltron, wondering whether your sheltron was even worth the gauge because you could have passively blocked it anyways. But its okay PLD has passive blocking so they must be OP as fck and need to be nerfed to oblivion. Only tank class with absolutely 0 self healing via Weapon skills or ability. If i want to heal I need to throw my damage in the toilet. A warrior can RI/Nascent for Fluff and get parries on boss autos, sheltron does nothing to crit autos which could make the entire duration feel lack luster or useless. The only thing a PLD has that is actually powerful is intervention at the cost of defensive CD but only really powerful during shared busters which most of the time get cheesed by invulns anyways.

I don't think passiv block makes PLDs op. I don't even think PLD is op at all, I think he is perfectly fine as it is and needs neither to be nerfed or buffed. Personally think passive block doesn't do much at all, neither do those minor heals on gcd abilities of the other tanks. Most of the outcome of passive block or the minor auto self heal I going to land in overheal anyway and it's also not going to keep you alive when things go bad in any non trivial content. On topic of shared tankbusters, every tank buster in E1S and E2S is shared, can't invul them all.^^

If block must remain at 20% then something of value must be gained. As it stands Sheltron isn't strong enough to justify denying PLD an extra CD for mitigation.

No Sheltrons strength doesn't justify PLD having one less personal cooldown. PLD having an extra raid CD does and as long as PLDs weaker personal mitigation doesn't become a huge problem, and it currently isn't, no change or scaling block is needed. To be fully honest tank balance overall is really good now and they should just leave it alone, they are more likely to mess it up than to improve it, so messing with it doesn't really seem worth the risk.

Also, you need to realize, the CAP for block is 20%. Most PLDs will most likely be blocking for a lower % most of the time since not everybody will be geared to the teeth. Also, there's level sync which hurts it too. I just did Susano and my block was at 15% due to level sync...that's just insulting.
Now, if Block started at 20% and went back to 30%. That'd be fine.

Also, it bothers me how the devs nerfed block and parry like they were one in the same. One is just some extra mitigation that you're never really expecting; you can just see it as the occasional treat. Whereas the other is literally the main source of the class's mitigation, it's essential to how the class stays alive and prevents damage.. And to make it worse, SE decided to nerf block MORE than parry. Like, how does that even make sense? It honestly feels like they were just trying to screw PLDs over just for the hell of it (assuming that they're leaving block at 20%).

And wha? You do realize that's always been the case for PLD, right? Overtime, their block strength has always gone up as better shields were brought into the game.

I do aggree hvaing block still sclae during lvling, or when downsynced, when the kit is clearly designed around 20% block strength, is kinda bad. Block strengh should be 20% at all lvls. But considering it's lvling and outdated content it's not really a big problem. Fun fact i think they nerfed parry strength because at 20% it would have been stronger than block during lvling/syncded, which would have been really awkward considering block ha a higher priority than parry. They nerfed Block down to 20% so that Sheltron is in line with the comparable coodlowns of teh other tanks, the yalso changed it from 1 hit blocked to all attacks for a duration for the same reason, but i don't see anyone having a problem with that.