Dispensers of fiery explosions, light me up... with your ideas for BLM in 5.0

[Kalise]

You misunderstand. I was simply trying to explain that the existing UI element itself could functionally fit in Astral Hearts without needing to be changed, using the same area of the design space as the existing Umbral Hearts. The only reason to change it would be for the addition of a resource that wasn't mutually exclusive.

And I was trying to convey that having multiple stacks on the gauge can functionally work.

It all depends on what design(s) are thought of that use them.

Essentially, saying "We could get up to 3 unique Hearts that stack up simultaneously"

As a way to allow freedom of design, rather than trying to restrict to "Well, this is what the job gauge looks like, we have to think of designs that work with that"

Like, there's no reason we can't have Astral/Umbral Hearts sharing the same spot on the gauge, just like we do with the AF/UI crystal stacks.

Just, I wanted to point out that we aren't necessarily restricted to ONLY that option and ONLY designs that work around mutually exclusive Astral/Umbral Hearts.

Perhaps, but it does have its place (particularly when level downsynched and forced into using weaker spells than F4 to inflict damage, or after using Transpose)

In down sync'd content, there's even LESS reason to actually pay attention to stacks. Since all your spells are generating stacks anyway. Pre-F3 when you're in AF your options are... F1 or F2. It doesn't matter if you're 1 or 3 stacks (Well, if you're 3 stacks you're level 40+ and thus have F3 + B3) you're using your one skill over and over and it's generating your stacks.

if the question is that existing elements at the core of the design are irrelevant, wouldn't a more constructive area of discussion be expounding on ways to make it relevant again, or discussing means to streamline the design for efficiency, rather than suggesting more elaborate evolutions purely for complication's sake?

Making stacks relevant is impossible unless you rework AF an UI phases completely.

Streamlining, would likely end up in removing the Stacks mechanic entirely and just having the traits at the relevant levels buff the phases up inherently. Which would free up F3 and B3 to be more useful than "Phase swap skills" (Outside of level 42-60 where Firestarter procs are used for DPS)

You could also further streamline and remove the time limit on phases. So your entire rotation is fuelled only by your MP needs (Which could be interesting, it could open up some MP management dynamics to use expensive and hard hitting Fire skills by swapping to UI just to get that extra bit of MP to fire them off)

An alternative is to scrap the AF/UI mechanic in its entirety and just make Fire spells inherently stronger and cost a bunch of MP and Ice spells free and restore MP. Thus the only Timer/Phase you need to care about is then Enochian. Which could maybe be fed into with resource management of Hearts (I.e. Expending Hearts furthers Enochian by X seconds, getting you closer to a Foul cast)

My reasoning for it being oGCD was actually that we already fight a pretty strict timer with AF, and that the assumption we'll get 6 F4s before swapping to UI is based purely off of a reasonable spell speed and our current MP consumption rate.

Well, ideally, that's the thing I'd look to challenge. At the moment, we're on a strict timer with AF because we want to use F4 above all else and F4 doesn't refresh AF.

But this is what causes the staleness in the rotation. Because you basically want to cast nothing but F4 during AF as it is the single most damaging Fire skill available (Unlike during levels 42-60 where F3 is stronger than F1 but costs more MP and has a longer cast time making it unappealing outside of Firestarter procs) with the only deviation being the single F1 as the most efficient way to refresh the duration of AF to let us spend the rest of our MP on F4's.

Thus, we could do with something that seeks to usurp F4 as a spell to cast during AF, albeit conditionally. So that we want to do something other than cast infinite F4's.

Though, the issue tends to be... What to do. Since, we don't like RNG procs being a heavy influence on overall DPS... But any sort of guaranteed build up will lead into a similarly robotic gameplay.

This would also give time during the UI phase to use more Blizzard spells. Given how critical you are of AF phase being F4 spam and UI being Thunder/Foul, I would think this would appeal to you.

The issue for me is that it likely still won't make you want to do anything other than F4 as GCD's in AF.

Even if it does gobble up the Thunder, it's still a DPS loss to actually hard cast it in AF (Heck, it's technically a DPS loss to hard cast it in UI too... Outside it leading to a DPS gain if you have TC procs in the future)

Also, "Give more time to use Blizzard spells in UI" - Oh right. 1 more GCD worth of Blizzard spells. Gee, I can hardly control my excitement...

I think my feelings on UI being 2 GCD's as maximum has been shown enough in this thread.

Within the same vein of logic where Comet would 'feel' cool to use, to downgrade Comet to just a part of our base rotation would just rehash the current Limit Break animations and make said LBs 'feel' less special.

Well, that depends entirely on how its animated.

It doesn't necessarily have to be animated as this giant rock slamming down like 1 second after the cast with a low "BLAM"

It could just be a large fireball appearing over the targets head and then crashing down in a blazing inferno.

Still "Comet"-y but while still retaining a distinct visual over the LB effects.

Plus if we get to the point where Fire V/I/I were considered possibilities, we'd be discussing cutting out half the existing Fire spells first, if only to avoid button bloat; we're already at that point for Fire 2 and Blizz 2.

It's most likely that Fire V/VI/VII would just end up being traits to boost up the potency of already existing Fire skills at this point.

Buffing up F1 into Fire V which does the same thing, but with more potency. F3 into Fire VI which does the same thing, but with more potency. F4 into Fire VII which again, same thing, more potency.

With Fire II being left to rot because it has already been usurped by Flare...

[Archwizard]

Thus, we could do with something that seeks to usurp F4 as a spell to cast during AF, albeit conditionally. So that we want to do something other than cast infinite F4's.

And therein lies the heart of the matter. So far every suggestion to add onto the Fire phase -- to squeeze in an extra spell or two in between F4s -- you have looked down on because we would still be casting majority F4 in AF. All this and you still have yet to actually say how many F4s per AF you'd consider a satisfactory number, yet still claim any non-zero proposal is too high.

Well, SMN/SCH will still cast majority Ruin, WHM will still DPS with majority Stone, AST will still DPS with majority Malefic. The only reason RDM gets a pass is because it has two of every skill and reason to alternate literally every one.
It's not a fault of the class design if it has any spell it wants to maximize -- only if it literally never has a reason to use anything else. In that regard, BLM is one of the least egregious examples.

As matters current stand we're working within the confines of a 13 second timer, with cast times longer than our GCD. Were the timer any longer, we might have reason to do anything more with AF/UI phases, but they would have to rebalance Polyglot and the time investment of Foul. Were our cast times, costs and regeneration speed any lower, we also might have reason to do more with the AF/UI phases, but none of those changes would bring much satisfaction to players nor come without severe rebalancing (not to mention missing even more casts during any movement period).

Meteor and Comet are distinct spells and have often been separated in previous titles. Given how rarely BLM gets to use their LB, I don't mind if it looks a little similar to it, but there's ways to distinguish the two.

They're usually only "distinct" in that one is a downgrade to the other. And all the caster LB1/2s are already visual downgrades of Meteor.

[Kalise]

And therein lies the heart of the matter. So far every suggestion to add onto the Fire phase -- to squeeze in an extra spell or two in between F4s -- you have looked down on because we would still be casting majority F4 in AF. All this and you still have yet to actually say how many F4s per AF you'd consider a satisfactory number, yet still claim any non-zero proposal is too high.

How many suggestions have there been?

(You know, outside of the what like 3-4 suggestions I have made myself)

I only recall actually "Looking down" on your single suggestion, which is "Shaking up" the AF phase by... Just tossing in an oGCD weave...

Meanwhile, the GCD rotation would continue to be the exact same thing of Fire IV > All with the only deviation being whatever is the most efficient way to renew AF. (At the moment, Fire I)

Outside of this, it's MY suggestions that have been shot down by OTHER people, with the same notion that I'm looking at suggestions with. Either it promotes the exactly the same sort of rotation as now (3x Powerful spell > 1x AF refresh spell > 3x Powerful spell)

Meanwhile, the ideal option is to have more diversity in the rotation. Sort of like how in UI, sometimes you throw out a Foul. Sometimes you have an insta-Thunder to cast. Sometimes you have to hard cast Thunder. This makes it vary and prevents it from being stales (Even though it's literally only 2-3 GCD's)

As opposed to always knowing that AF is going to be some variant of 313. Maybe with a high SpS build getting away with 414 with use of Convert for extra MP.

"How many Fire IV's are satisfactory?" as many as are required to fill in the time between using other, better skills is my answer.

The spell that you just spam ad infinitum, should be your filler. Your last resort when your stronger skills are unavailable - Due to procs, special resources or CD's.

Your filler shouldn't also be your best skill. Since that leads to stale gameplay.

Well, SMN/SCH will still cast majority Ruin, WHM will still DPS with majority Stone, AST will still DPS with majority Malefic. The only reason RDM gets a pass is because it has two of every skill and reason to alternate literally every one.

Healers are an awful example to use, because I'm vehemently against them having essentially single button rotations (Which is the majority of what they do, their only variance is putting up 1-2 DoTs...)

SMN is different, because they want to be using Ruin IV all the time, however, they cannot because it has to proc to be available. In addition, they have their Trance which makes their Ruin instant cast, which changes the flow of their gameplay. In addition, they have their Bahamut phase where they switch to using Ruin III to ensure the most Wyrmwave casts. In addition, they manage 2 DoTs with different durations that aren't 100% uptime with their oGCD applicator.

RDM is also different because they shift what they cast based off procs. If they don't proc Verfire or Verstone then they will alternate between using Jolt and Impact for their filler.

Both of these Mages have skills they WANT to use over their filler skills (SMN wants to use DoT's if they're about to fall off and Ruin IV otherwise. RDM wants to use Verfire + Verstone and if those don't proc, Impact.) but are conditional in when they are available or appropriate to use.

BLM in AF is not the same. It is more like the Healers that only have 2-3 damaging skills to spend GCD's on. Its filler is also its best cast (At least Healers prioritize applying their DoTs over their nuke...)

They're usually only "distinct" in that one is a downgrade to the other. And all the caster LB1/2s are already visual downgrades of Meteor.

There's nothing stopping them creating a distinction.

For example, I'm suggesting Comet be a single target Fire damage nuke.

As opposed to an AoE unaspected nuke.

Thus, the Comet skill could use a much smaller projectile, there could be much more fire on the projectile and the impact could have flashy fiery effects much as you'd expect from something that is an upgrade from the current Fire III and Fire IV visuals.

And if the fix is purely cosmetic, why does it matter if we get Comet? Why wouldn't any other spell fit, like the Burst spell that keeps being called for?

Because not a lot of other spells could substitute in for a Fire Aspected spell?

Burst is Lightning, not Fire.

Doomsday... Is literally the same thing, except it would be MORE powerful than the LB3 due to being a higher class of the same line of "Rocks fall, everyone dies" spells.

Apocalypse... Is often depicted as a lightning storm. In VIII it's some sort of Ion Cannon type laser that then explodes.

I suppose there's Megaflare and Gigaflare that could work. Though, I expect it'd be confusing with the already implemented Flare and the current naming system.

[Kabooa]

BLM in AF is not the same. It is more like the Healers that only have 2-3 damaging skills to spend GCD's on. Its filler is also its best cast (At least Healers prioritize applying their DoTs over their nuke...)

Yes, Black mage is not the same.

Almost all their gameplay decisions are based around the encounter forcing them to move, and how to best maintain their uptime while not frivolously using their movement tools that would leave them completely unable to do anything during extended movement.

[Archwizard]

How many suggestions have there been?
I only recall actually "Looking down" on your single suggestion, which is "Shaking up" the AF phase by... Just tossing in an oGCD weave...

You have shot down other suggestions of mine before in this matter, the last specifically regarding another iteration of the spell Burst. Forgive me if I misremember, weren't you also calling for Flare and Freeze to be added to the single-target rotation? Because that individual, if I recall, shot down suggestions during that time which enforced the two as AoEs.

It's a 31-page thread that's almost 2.5 months old, I'm not going to go skim for every example.

The spell that you just spam ad infinitum, should be your filler. Your last resort when your stronger skills are unavailable - Due to procs, special resources or CD's.

Your filler shouldn't also be your best skill. Since that leads to stale gameplay.

Foul is stronger, Thundercloud procs are stronger. Furthermore, Fire IV requires maintenance of its own, becoming unavailable or a bad option periodically throughout the rotation. Even by your reductive definition, this still doesn't necessarily sound like the BLM rotation is flawed in that regard.

SMN is different
RDM is also different

As well they should be, that's why there are multiple caster jobs. There's no rule that says "every DPS rotation must have the same skeleton".

BLM in AF is not the same. It is more like the Healers that only have 2-3 damaging skills to spend GCD's on. Its filler is also its best cast (At least Healers prioritize applying their DoTs over their nuke...)

Combined with your previous statements about not wanting to hardcast Thunder, I would say that warrants some critical feedback in itself. If the full potency of Thunder III (give or take 1-2 ticks) doesn't outweigh Fire IV outside of Thundercloud procs, that should be addressed.

Because not a lot of other spells could substitute in for a Fire Aspected spell?

Why does your suggested "spell to break up Fire IV spam" need to be Fire-Aspected? We have two other elements to account for during the Fire phase -- Thunder and Unaspected (Dark?). If Blizz 4's value is entirely in enhancing Fire spells, I see no reason not to have Fire IV build up to or enhance another element. In fact, if anything it could make the elements at the BLM's disposal somewhat less disparate.
All it needs to be is more cost-efficient than a F4 and only castable during AF (the latter of which being why we don't use Foul/T4 for the purpose you suggest), and the rotation will work itself around it.

I suppose there's Megaflare and Gigaflare that could work. Though, I expect it'd be confusing with the already implemented Flare and the current naming system.

I see no problem with this.

Although I think the bigger obstacle there is Teraflare being SMN's LB3.

[Kalise]

You have shot down other suggestions of mine before in this matter, the last specifically regarding another iteration of the spell Burst. Forgive me if I misremember, weren't you also calling for Flare and Freeze to be added to the single-target rotation? Because that individual, if I recall, shot down suggestions during that time which enforced the two as AoEs.

I provide my feedback on ideas that get put forth, which is literally the point of using the forums.

Just like people have critiqued ideas of mine, I have the right to critique the ideas of others.

Not to "Shoot down" ideas, but to put forth my own thoughts about maybe things to think about to adjust said ideas to make them more refined.

As far as me "Shooting down" suggestions about Freeze and Flare being relegated to AoE... As I recall, I made a point about not actually getting involved in the discussion around improving their use in an AoE situation. Then later mentioned that the reason for that is because I'd personally prefer if they had some use in ST situations too and then came up with an initial idea for that sort of implementation (However flawed)

Foul is stronger, Thundercloud procs are stronger. Furthermore, Fire IV requires maintenance of its own, becoming unavailable or a bad option periodically throughout the rotation. Even by your reductive definition, this still doesn't necessarily sound like the BLM rotation is flawed in that regard.

Neither Foul nor Thundercloud procs are desired to be used in AF phase.

During AF phase you want to be using only Fire IV and Fire I.

It's not worth it to lose out on a Fire IV cast to use the "Stronger" Foul or TCloud proc because while they are stronger, they're not THAT strong to cover the entire Fire IV you miss due to the limited time you have during an AF phase.

Why does your suggested "spell to break up Fire IV spam" need to be Fire-Aspected?

Because otherwise the potency would need to be absolutely nuts. Meaning that in order to make it work without wrecking UI phase, you'd have to implement some convoluted system that allows it to ONLY be usable in AF.

Which has the risk of further perpetuating the static rotation too, if it's for example built off of using certain skills during AF. Like, say, if it used Astral Hearts which were only built up during AF when using Fire IV, then the rotation would simply be a static "Fire IV > Fire IV > Fire IV > Fire I > New Spell > Fire IV > Fire IV" which wouldn't be much better.

Meanwhile, there already exists a system to limit skill usage during AF. It's called Astral Fire. The literal buff to all Fire skills specifically during AF combined with UI's massive debuff to all fire skills during UI.

Why complicate things just to add in a non-Fire aspected spell during AF phase when you literally can just make a Fire aspected spell and it by default is already designed to be exclusive to the phase?

You seem to be very intent on deliberately misreading what I have to say (and what the others in this thread have to say, it would seem).

The group's total damage suffers when any player dies, but any individual player's damage does not suffer when they still get access to the utility tools that the player who died still gets to use. Nothing about that is complicated.

Weakness does not affect the damage bonus that the other seven players receive from Battle Voice, etc. It does however gimp BLM's only contribution to the raid.

Dying on any job, reduces effectiveness in battle.

While jobs with utility buffs can still get full effectiveness from their buffs on others while Weakened, the flip side is that their buffs get reduced effectiveness if OTHER players are weakened.

None of this makes any particular balancing of a job (Raw DPS vs Utility) at an inherent disadvantage.

If anything, the disadvantages stem more from how personal resources factor into things. For example: RDM has a hard time regaining MP if their Lucid is on CD which limits their ability to Raise spam. SMN has a ridiculously long wind up for their Bahamut burst that is reset outright upon death. BRD has to deal with their Songs being on CD as well as maybe also having to re-apply their DoTs. NIN has to hope their Ninjutsu is ready to be able to get Huton back on. DRG loses all stacks which they had. MNK has to regain their Greased Lightning stacks.

So, if death penalty was a major factor in this sort of balancing, SMN wouldn't be meta. Since, not only is a majority of what they bring based on their own personal damage (Yes they have a Raise and they have Contagion which can buff 2-3 other non-DPS jobs but this is not the major part of why they are wanted in groups) meaning they are affected by Weakness to a near similar degree to BLM, but they ALSO have the crippling factor that is resetting their Bahamut progress.

This is why I doubt your "Proof" about how "Damage as Utility cannot work" when the main issue is simply that SMN has almost the same damage with their minor utility on top. Which is more indicative of BLM/SAM just simply not having enough damage to account for their lack of utility than the notion that personal damage jobs are inherently non-viable.

[Archwizard]

Neither Foul nor Thundercloud procs are desired to be used in AF phase.

During AF phase you want to be using only Fire IV and Fire I.

It's not worth it to lose out on a Fire IV cast to use the "Stronger" Foul or TCloud proc because while they are stronger, they're not THAT strong to cover the entire Fire IV you miss due to the limited time you have during an AF phase.

You use them outside AF phase because you have a limited number of GCDs per phase, the ability to hold them, and would prefer to drop a Blizzard spell due to UI's lower contribution to damage. (650-260) > (650-540), quik maffz.

Remove that choice (or make it a damage loss to hold them that long), and their potencies are high enough you would use them as they came up.

Because otherwise the potency would need to be absolutely nuts. Meaning that in order to make it work without wrecking UI phase, you'd have to implement some convoluted system that allows it to ONLY be usable in AF.

Moot point; AF is entirely a potency boost in the first place and no other benefit (a detriment even, given the additional cost increase), making Fire IV an effective potency of 540. The same reasoning is why we save Foul/T3 for UI phase in the first place.

It's not difficult to grasp an addendum like "Can only be executed while under the effect of Astral Fire," Fire IV literally has the exact same descriptor written in. At any rate, I don't think the mind behind "Penumbral Hearts" should be casting aspersions on what should or shouldn't be considered "convoluted".

Which has the risk of further perpetuating the static rotation too, if it's for example built off of using certain skills during AF. Like, say, if it used Astral Hearts which were only built up during AF when using Fire IV, then the rotation would simply be a static "Fire IV > Fire IV > Fire IV > Fire I > New Spell > Fire IV > Fire IV" which wouldn't be much better.

And once again we circle back to "How many Fire IVs is too many?"

I would highly doubt that whatever changes coming to us in ShB -- without a major rework, at any rate -- will lead to much more significant change to the current rotational model. All we got in Stormblood were Triplecast and Foul, and as you so enjoy pointing out, they literally didn't affect AF at all. "Add 1-2 spells to the AF phase" would be literally more change to it than we've gotten since Fire IV, and the only way we'd see significantly fewer F4s in the rotation would be if they added a replacement filler.

While jobs with utility buffs can still get full effectiveness from their buffs on others while Weakened, the flip side is that their buffs get reduced effectiveness if OTHER players are weakened.

Bit of a non-sequitur to this conversation, given that unless I can affect their survival in some way, my performance and value aren't going to be gauged by other people dying. If enough people are getting Weakness to cancel out whatever utilities you're bringing, that's a completely unrelated problem from your group's Job composition.

So, if death penalty was a major factor in this sort of balancing, SMN wouldn't be meta.

Death penalty is a factor, it's just not assumed when you're at a point in progression where Raises cease to matter.
So either SMN comes out ahead of BLM in spite of its death penalty because it has Resurrect to mitigate other death penalties (hey, it's enough to consider RDMs), or it comes out ahead because it brings near similar damage (particularly with concern to movement-heavy encounters) and group buffs.

[Kalise]

You use them outside AF phase because you have a limited number of GCDs per phase, the ability to hold them, and would prefer to drop a Blizzard spell due to UI's lower contribution to damage. (650-260) > (650-540), quik maffz.

Remove that choice (or make it a damage loss to hold them that long), and their potencies are high enough you would use them as they came up.

Yes, you highlighted what I was eluding to with my statement about not wanting to use said skills during AF, which makes AF phase bland.

Simply removing the choice around using them, doesn't really solve the problem, it merely shifts it over to UI phase, since given you spend the majority of your time in AF it's likely that you will have Foul and Thundercloud being used then if it was not possible to hold them for any length of time (Which would be tricky to actually make happen, given that time in AF is limited by MP, if the case was that you couldn't hold onto these skills at all and they happened to come up after your final F4 so you're out of MP and time on AF you'd be forced to either skip them or drop Enochian... Not exactly fun gameplay)

It would be a better solution though, because given how short UI phases are, it's harder for the staleness to kick in much (Well... It's basically Thunder + Blizzard IV + Fire III if you're not squeezing a Foul in there somewhere)

Moot point; AF is entirely a potency boost in the first place and no other benefit (a detriment even, given the additional cost increase), making Fire IV an effective potency of 540. The same reasoning is why we save Foul/T3 for UI phase in the first place.

It's not moot.

As is the case at the moment, Fire IV is working on an effective 540 potency, this causes it to be the single highest damage skill that is readily available. If anything was to compete with this potency, it would need to be designed in a way where we wouldn't just replace parts of the UI phase with it, so as to allow us to maximize our output within AF using Fire spells to make use of the potency boost it gives.

Making a new Fire aspected skill is the easiest way to make something only useful in AF phase.

It's not difficult to grasp an addendum like "Can only be executed while under the effect of Astral Fire," Fire IV literally has the exact same descriptor written in.

True, though, you'd have to question the reasoning behind such an addendum.

Like, Fire IV and Blizzard IV having the AF/UI lock addendum makes sense because it's literally suggesting "You need to be in tune with Fire/Ice to be able to use these powerful Fire/Ice spells"

Having an Astral Fire lock on say, a Dark aspected spell would be odd.

At any rate, I don't think the mind behind "Penumbral Hearts" should be casting aspersions on what should or shouldn't be considered "convoluted".

What's convoluted about Penumbral Hearts?

We have Umbral Ice (Umbral referring to the Moon blocking the light from the Sun causing an eclipse). We have Astral Fire (Astral referring to stars, such as the Sun).

Then we have Umbral Hearts as a resource to use. This implies a possible "Astral Heart" to have as a second resource to use in a similar manner.

With BLM also being focused around a third element, Lightning. Which currently has no phase associated with it. Thus, I thought up the idea of "Penumbral Hearts" (Penumral referring to when the Earth is blocking part of the light from the Sun leaving the Moon in the outer part of its shadow (Which is called the Penumbra) the effect of which causes a reddish hue on the Moon which is oft referred to as a "Blood Moon")

The name still follows the theme of celestial bodies, without being directly associated with the Sun or the Moon and referring instead to the Earth (Meaning that in this trifecta of celestial bodies, we have Astral being the Sun, Umbral being the Moon and Penumbral being the Earth)

And once again we circle back to "How many Fire IVs is too many?"

No we don't.

You cycle back to that because you're not reading my response to it.

There isn't a definitive answer for "How many Fire IV's is too many?" because that's not even the question that should be being asked. Since the issue isn't the number of Fire IV's that are being cast - Literally you could triple the damage and MP cost of Fire IV and reduce the rotation down to Fire IV > Fire I > Fire IV and it would have the same issue.

The issue being that, Fire IV is our Astral Fire phase filler spell. It's the spell we default back to when we have nothing better to cast. Just like how every other non-combo based job has their own filler skills (Healers have Broil/Malefic/Stone, RDM has Jolt/Impact, SMN has Ruin, BRD has Heavy Shot, BLU has Glower)

But... We simply don't have anything better to cast. Not in Astral Fire phase. Yes, we have stronger skills - Thundercloud proc and Foul have higher potency. But their lenience in when to be cast, combined with the complete lack of any actually worthwhile Ice skills, means that it's never necessary to cast them during Astral Fire phase.

If there was a conditionally better skill to use during AF (Such as how at levels 42-60 we have Firestarter procs to allow us to use a free, instant cast Fire III) or if there was actually worthwhile skills in UI (So that "Saving" TCloud and Foul to use during the time we're actually in that phase wouldn't be a thing) then there wouldn't be this issue of staleness with AF and the Fire IV spam.

The thing is, that neither of the above points are easily solved. The former solution, whereby there is a conditionally better skill to use during AF, is plagued by the 2 main design pitfalls for it:

1) There's the possibility to add in Firestarter type RNG. But people tend to not like DPS being so directly linked to RNG skills.

2) There's the possibility to add in a new resource that can be generated and then expended during AF to utilize a new skill. This has the problem that it can be too consistent. Consistency will cause any more potent skill to simply be slotted in to an appropriate place within the static AF rotation, thus not actually achieving any sense of "Shaking up" the rotation.

The latter solution, requires a rework of core systems for BLM, whereby the entire design of AF/UI gets upended, so that there isn't the dichotomy between "Damage phase" and "Procs phase" and instead it's more of "Damage phase" and "Other damage phase" - With the differences and nuances between them being about resource management, both with MP and potentially other resources that can be expended during UI and generated in AF. Which, if designed well, could also allow for more dynamic gameplay, wherein rotations are less about doing static rotations during predetermined periods of time in each phase and more about adapting to the situation such that maybe you swap between phases more frequently to juggle resources instead of "Bottom out MP > Swap > Regen all MP > Swap"

Now... As a realist, the most likely scenario is that they will take the initial solution and just stick an RNG proc into Astral Fire. Since, that's what they have fueling the other 2 real mages - SMN having Ruin IV procs off pet actions and RDM having Verfire/Verstone procs off their Verthunder/Veraero spells.

Though, while it's certainly the simplest and most likely solution, as a player and forum user, I would like to discuss the concept of "Is it the best solution?", which would include, thinking up potential ways to create alternate solutions and having them assessed by fellow players whom enjoy playing the class - Since any solution should be aimed at making sure that the players of the class will still enjoy playing the class and ideally will get more enjoyment out of playing the class.

Thus, I come up with things that can maybe generate ideas. Since, more ideas put together allows people to take the best parts of multiple ideas and then refine them into the "Best solution"

Is sticking a bunch of Astral and Penumbral Hearts onto the Job gauge and calling it a day the "Best solution"? No, obviously not. But maybe such a thing might provoke someone into having an epiphany and formulating an idea from such a premise.

Like... Maybe Astral Fire phases utilize Fire and Lightning spells to generate Astral Hearts and Penumbral Hearts. Which are then used during Umbral Ice phases to empower Ice and Lightning spells to a competitive level. Creating the aforementioned "Damage Phase" + "Other Damage Phase" style gameplay, with an emphasis on resource management between both phases. - Potentially with such a gameplay shift altering other parts of the job gauge. Like... What if phases no longer had durations or stacks and simply lasted until we swapped them? What if the only timer we managed was Enochian? What if Enochian, instead of simply granting a Polyglot, also put us into a temporary "Penumbral Lightning" phase which had some interesting and cool effect to it that maybe upgraded some skills or something (Maybe this phase is activated using a Polyglot instead of using Foul and wants to be timed for when we have certain CD's available or certain resources generated)

Maybe something else entirely?

I don't know. I'm only one person. There are only a finite number of ideas I can generate in the time I spend thinking about this sort of thing (I.e. The time it takes me to type out each paragraph >.>)

[Lauront]

I see no problem with this.

Although I think the bigger obstacle there is Teraflare being SMN's LB3.

I like the look of it. It's not too dissimilar to Entropic Flame in terms of its fire/laser blast aesthetic. The SMN LB3 has quite a few elaborations to it that should preserve its uniqueness, but I'm guessing you mean in terms of the name. I'd say the ranged LB1 and 2 have closer similarity in terms of the sheer look, but putting aside all constraints for the moment... if you were to combine Flare from FFVIII with Entropic Flame from multiple directions, like some of the raid bosses or the Ascian Prime, that would have a pretty awesome impact for an AOE fire spell. Entropic Flare has a pretty nice ring to it.

Also, I like this iteration of Flare. With some tweaking, either VIII's or the WoFF version could provide a fitting look for a new Fire spell.