That's my issue though, they could have they had the resources to they just didn't want the feedback of not having viera, that's what it all boils down to for me, and that's my issue. They obviously wanted to add in the hrothgar but chose to cave to the viera demand, no matter how you look at this, this was not done to please everyone, it was done to divide feedback as much as possible while also hyping up the expansion with the tagline "new races", again my issue with your post is that you state things as if they are objective facts.
This was not the best solution because people who have wanted a full beastial race, do not have them, and people who wanted to finally see male viera, do not have them. Before you say "you can't please everyone" this was literally an option meant to please everyone and there is still divisive feedback whether you call it vocal minority or not. The issue is with the way it was handled, it should have been expressed early on clearly that male viera would not be added.
I'm not going to argue with you about genders taking up added in content because we don't know the teams work schedule, who is on what and what gets what priority. We don't even know what content we're getting besides a 24 man, 8 man and a 5.0 eureka, I think it's ridiculous to act as if they would put any of that content behind for models or models would take up that content's cycle, especially when content like eureka and diadem and even BLU have been pushed back a patch for completely separate reasons. Saying content would be canceled or pushed back as if it is unprecedented is just a disingenuous argument meant to make it seem technically unfeasible.
I call them gimped because for all of their sacrifices they can't even equip helmets or glasses to be added later, they are gimped in every way of the word and it came at the cost of adding in "two" races instead of just one.



Reply With Quote


