Why FFXIV is The Best

[Zsolen]

It is not bad plain and simple. You don't get quality if you keep changing your own lore. Star Wars did that. It created a weird unwieldy EU for a long time with some of it god and some of it really bad. If SE implemented male Viera as a playable race, it would be lowering their standard.

Also, I remember people asking for Ronso or a more bestial race.

You asked for Viera and got it. It's a race where we only ever see the females for lore reasons. As a result, we ended up with male only Ronso to balance it out. It's really not that complicated.

[Dustytome]

It is not bad plain and simple. You don't get quality if you keep changing your own lore. Star Wars did that. It created a weird unwieldy EU for a long time with some of it god and some of it really bad. If SE implemented male Viera as a playable race, it would be lowering their standard.

The lore is based on how their society has functioned thus far. Their home is in peril and that requires them to either stubbornly cling to tradition and accept extinction, or break tradition and venture out to try and save their homes and their people.

[Zsolen]

The lore is based on how their society has functioned thus far. Their home is in peril and that requires them to either stubbornly cling to tradition and accept extinction, or break tradition and venture out to try and save their homes and their people.

Even if that were true, they still wouldn't be the WoL/WoD or adventurers at all, since your character would still have to get to that point in the story anyway. The is a great chance that is not true anyway, since you just made it up. We might not even see one. If you allow them as WoL/WoD, you also allow them as widespread adventurers at the same time.

[WhiteArchmage]

Even if that were true, they still wouldn't be the WoL/WoD or adventurers at all, since your character would still have to get to that point in the story anyway. The is a great chance that is not true anyway, since you just made it up. We might not even see one. If you allow them as WoL/WoD, you also allow them as widespread adventurers at the same time.

The WoL is always an outlier. I can't repeat this enough. The WoL is this strange adventurer that belongs nowhere, isn't of any race in particular (hence why you can be a Duskwight and waltz into Gridania, or a Male Moonkeeper), and comes from nowhere at a vague point in time 5 years after the Calamity. The WoL has no lore to tie him down except coming to Eorzea for whatever reason, and being one of Hydaelin's many chosen, and she can damn well choose a Male Viera or a Female Hrothgar. Other Adventurers are not canonical to the Lore, hence why there can be 2 (6 in an alliance) non-padjali White Mages in one party, or 4 Summoners, or 4 Black Mages, or 2 Scholars.

[Zsolen]

The WoL is always an outlier. I can't repeat this enough. The WoL is this strange adventurer that belongs nowhere, isn't of any race in particular (hence why you can be a Duskwight and waltz into Gridania, or a Male Moonkeeper), and comes from nowhere at a vague point in time 5 years after the Calamity. The WoL has no lore to tie him down except coming to Eorzea for whatever reason, and being one of Hydaelin's many chosen, and she can damn well choose a Male Viera or a Female Hrothgar. Other Adventurers are not canonical to the Lore, hence why there can be 2 (6 in an alliance) non-padjali White Mages in one party, or 4 Summoners, or 4 Black Mages, or 2 Scholars.

Maybe read what I wrote? All the people that also choose that gender and race are still considered part of your world, but they are simply adventurers in your eyes. They still exist. Even if they are seen as a class, instead (f need be). But you can't assume they are a different race or gender. Also a male Viera likely wouldn't heed any call like that anyway.

[WhiteArchmage]

Maybe read what I wrote? All the people that also choose that gender and race are still considered part of your world, but they are simply adventurers in your eyes. They still exist. Even if they are seen as a class, instead (f need be). But you can't assume they are a different race or gender. Also a male Viera likely wouldn't heed any call like that anyway.

They still exist, as random adventurers which the game doesn't delve into races or classes; there's even instances which are fuzzy on if our WoL does things alone or with others (in fact, most of the "call your adventurer friends" lines are from EN client, the other languages imply you did them alone). Again, Male Miqo'te, especially Keeper Males like my toon. They're supposed to have a lower birthrate than Male Viera and also be secretive and seclusive, yet they're very popular.

And why wouldn't a Male Viera heed the call? They're not a hive mind like the Gnath, and even the Gnath can leave the Onemind, there can always be that One teen that rejects his training, that One male that says "Screw this" and leaves, that One hunter that followed his prey too far out of the Wood and is now curious about this strange new world. The WoL is that One.

[strawberrycake11]

It is not bad plain and simple. You don't get quality if you keep changing your own lore. Star Wars did that. It created a weird unwieldy EU for a long time with some of it god and some of it really bad. If SE implemented male Viera as a playable race, it would be lowering their standard.

Also, I remember people asking for Ronso or a more bestial race.

You asked for Viera and got it. It's a race where we only ever see the females for lore reasons. As a result, we ended up with male only Ronso to balance it out. It's really not that complicated.

I said, perhaps with too many words, that choosing to do two gender-locked races is a breaking a promise, breaching trust, and lowering overall quality and credibility. That in and of itself is a bad thing, especially given how it has all been handled. You would disagree with that?

I am not talking about lore at all. If I'm being honest, I personally didn't want viera to begin with, because they are a race from Ivalice that has been somehow magically transplanted to another world called Hydaelyn because fans like them, where they did not originate from and do not belong, and that sounds pretty against the lore to me. But, lore aside, they went back on their word and are changing something that is a staple of the game, that made it unique, and are releasing something that is lower quality than previously. Full stop.

[Zsolen]

I said, perhaps with too many words, that choosing to do two gender-locked races is a breaking a promise, breaching trust, and lowering overall quality and credibility. That in and of itself is a bad thing, especially given how it has all been handled. You would disagree with that?

I am not talking about lore at all. If I'm being honest, I personally didn't want viera to begin with, because they are a race from Ivalice that has been somehow magically transplanted to another world called Hydaelyn because fans like them, where they did not originate from and do not belong, and that sounds pretty against the lore to me. But, lore aside, they went back on their word and are changing something that is a staple of the game, that made it unique, and are releasing something that is lower quality than previously. Full stop.

You say it is lower quality to have genderlock, but I told you why is was the opposite with actual reasoning. Lore. You have to talk about lore, if you want to have a proper counter-argument. These are not the same Viera from Ivalice, but they carry similar lore. If you cannot address that, then you cannot make a proper counter-argument.

We need to do more to help lore, and not bash it in continually. That is a problem this game has from time to time, but it manages it mostly okay overall. It shouldn't be removed, because someone has a political agenda, fetish (despite not knowing what they even look like), or whatever the case is.

[strawberrycake11]

You say it is lower quality to have genderlock, but I told you why is was the opposite with actual reasoning. Lore. You have to talk about lore, if you want to have a proper counter-argument. These are not the same Viera from Ivalice, but they carry similar lore. If you cannot address that, then you cannot make a proper counter-argument.

We need to do more to help lore, and not bash it in continually. That is a problem this game has from time to time, but it manages it mostly okay overall. It shouldn't be removed, because someone has a political agenda, fetish (despite not knowing what they even look like), or whatever the case is.

No, I really don't need to address lore. Because telling the people that play your game one thing and then doing the exact opposite of that thing years later is a Bad Thing. That's it! Take everything else out the equation. That sentence could be about literally anything in game, but the promise they broke was the one on gender-locking, so that's what's being addressed. If they cared about the promise they made, AND cared about your so-called lore, they wouldn't have made viera playable in the first place.

But if I absolutely must be dragged into talking about lore, I'm sorry, but I'm gonna repeat myself here: according to lore, viera don't live on Hydaelyn. They're from Ivalice. There was no lore reason for them to be here other than the fact that fans wanted them, and the devs said, okay, they can be here now too. If you can disregard that huge lore jump, you can't tell other people that they can't disregard another because it's lore. That's cherrypicking.

Also, male viera have feet. They can walk. They can pull a Fran and skedaddle right out of the woods if they chose too. They're beings with free will. Just because their society has one idea in mind, according to the lore, does not mean every single individual would follow it. That's not how that works. That's not how people work. Female viera leave the forest very rarely as is. Very, very rarely. Really, if they leave in such small numbers, it wouldn't make sense for them to be playable either, would it? And, personally, I think a singular male viera running away from home to see the world is much more believable than an entire race suddenly existing in another world because they're fan favorites.

[R041]

You say it is lower quality to have genderlock, but I told you why is was the opposite with actual reasoning. Lore. You have to talk about lore, if you want to have a proper counter-argument. These are not the same Viera from Ivalice, but they carry similar lore. If you cannot address that, then you cannot make a proper counter-argument.

We need to do more to help lore, and not bash it in continually. That is a problem this game has from time to time, but it manages it mostly okay overall. It shouldn't be removed, because someone has a political agenda, fetish (despite not knowing what they even look like), or whatever the case is.

I don't think 'Lore' should ever be a reason in FFXIV - Let's be honest with ourselves here, the FFXIV world building is pretty bad, it doesn't stand on it's own and mostly just pulls from the other titles as it sees fit, and it's usually just side-notes from a writer that people take as holy writing. Half of the time it makes a mess out of the original IP and just uses it as a Themepark with "Let's throw this ol' FF boss in there" as the initial idea, 'world-building' tacked on.

Hrothgar look nothing like Ronso outside of having the OPTIONS of blue fur and a horn, for Themepark reasons. But then Viera are nearly identical in FFXIV to FFXII?

There's so much picking and choosing for sake of argument, it's moot because this game is 90% themepark random bullshit anyway. There's only one actual deciding factor, it's the Dev Team making non-transparent decisions and acting coy about everything they do. Which only causes frustration and confusion. It's likely due to budget, it's pretty clear that they mostly make developmental decisions that front-load a couple of features leaving little else for the rest of their ideas.

They probably started Viera with good intentions, but quickly found out that doubling the work-load with a male character would be atrocious, so they took an easy option and just made a quarter-baked race to try and ease the pain. Which was still likely decided early on. Or maybe it was originally going to be M/F for both and it was absolutely too much work. Why even bother with concept art if a Lead didn't have any intention of working on it at all? Concept art still takes a lot of time and money away from other projects, which they seem to never have. But that's speculation, you could argue that they were only curious. But even then "Male Viera seem weird" is such a strange reason coming from Final Fantasy, not that I actually believe it but it does kinda seem like the JP crowd might have an image problem if that's a legitimate excuse.

I'm not really in the 'upset with gender-locked' crowd, but I get it. You really have to wonder though, how many more times can SE give the "It's too much work" excuse? Maybe stop releasing half-baked content and actually focus on solid and fully tested features? Maybe stop trying to keep the bleeding edge busy with volatile content that dies out just as quickly as it started? I'd be more worried about beginner retention than anything, it's a creep and they still haven't done much about it.