Results -9 to 0 of 93

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Kazhim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    90
    Character
    Umah Rahab
    World
    Lich
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 71
    right then

    tolkien and ishgard are bad and have no inspiration

    so that what you want me to say?

    No

    Ishgard is bad designed, bad wrote, and i dont expect much thing of this classico classic of this kingdom, are you able to figur that out or no?
    Tolkien deserve that he work harder to make his univers less obvious, and also take byzantine part to do some kind of kingdom near to europe is also merge that i spoke just before, where Yshgard just do a copy of what already existed, with not much deeper stuff.
    I created a religious power in the tale that i work but no where you ll find inquisitor, or pop or archibishop, you ll get monk, which is really common, and some synonym rarely used.

    and for other kingdom i create, i TRY to creat my own word to give them a role and title.

    That is the start of work about a fantasy world you want to create, and tolkien did this too.

    You always influent by your own culture and knowledge, and society, but to make your univers unique, you avoid to take same word used, same design seeing everywhere and so on.

    What do we have at Isghard, ? 3 poor city with strongholg very classic, just a copy from pictured castle on google. Woo, yes that not a Minas Tirit if we have to compare.

    Isghard is a lack of identity and imagination, in the tale , in the global ambiant, in architectur, and design. Oh yes maybe those stars watcher scientist with their weird hat are "original" i admit this.

    But seriously, stop to be "the master of lore of FFXIV", ff XIV has the right to be not perfect, to be criticized, you all tell me : "i dont know isghard cause i didnt play the part" , i started it, and from what i see it is bad, very bad, but it doesnt matter at all, Gaius was also bad, and some other stuff too. SO whats your problem.? Defending Yshgard from his obvious default wont make it better.

    I dont like those who take easy word and ref to creat a kingdom or a univers, i find that lazy, as the story of Isghard show it.
    Heretic, crusader, plot against the noble, we saw this 150 times, and here it was bad managed, no one has good reaction, like the guy who inspect the delivery to his lord "OMG the symbol of heretic, that mean the prince belong to them" come on, even if in middle age they could be very naive, there were some more clever guy.
    And other reaction are not even explained in the different scene. No one looked for the true Guillemain, (yeah yeah i read) or when the inquisitor speak about the crime of crusader, no one keep an attention on it.
    Basic plot on level and chara design very poorly inspired.
    Doest matter once again, the game has the right to not be perfect. But stop your zelotism about " you dont know Ishgard" you dont even look for defend it, you just tell me to shut up because i dont know the "kingdom" which is not true,

    Now you are free to send picture, give some other argument than "you have no right to critic". As some already did it to answer to this topic.
    (0)
    Last edited by Kazhim; 02-12-2019 at 01:41 PM.