Quote Originally Posted by Enla View Post
You're basically doing the equivalent of criticizing Gondor for not appearing in LoTR after reading Fellowship of the Ring but haven't actually read Two Towers or Return of the King to see if it comes up - let alone knowing anything about it. Just play the game and then form an opinion. If you still think Ishard is still so horrible once you actually get through it then fine. People are entitled to their opinions. What people are criticizing you for is the lack of informed opinion. Which your post here basically just reinforced.
Hell no, Lord of the ring, is really better, and built his myth and background on very very large period, also i never saw Gondor or Rohan as a remake of middle age in europe, but a merge of many inspiration and cultur with a very strong identity. Tell me is there archi bishop in gondor? Do you see any crusade or inquisitor stuff in lord of the ring? Is gandalf look like Merlin?
No no no and no.
So dont compare two tales who has definitely not the same level of writting and deep.

For what i saw from Ishgard and only on basic game that i finish the story : Ishgard has no use, no interest, and his inspiration too much close from england and france make it very common and déjà vu. Ishgard is just useless, has no major role, and has less identity than other kingdom in the game.
Else we have the right to phrase criticisme, i gave some argument no? SO accept it or let this topic away, we can not be agree always, but still i have right to spell what is wrong for me.