Page 40 of 47 FirstFirst ... 30 38 39 40 41 42 ... LastLast
Results 391 to 400 of 461
  1. #391
    Player
    TheVigilant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    172
    Character
    Seraphiel Warbreaker
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Reaper Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Lastelli View Post
    -
    I agree with much of what you said, Nintendo owns Fatal Frame as an IP from Koei Tecmo and it's filled with ghosts, girls in bikini, stories of torture, homicide and rituals, and then the console now has Dark Souls, promoted by Nintendo with an Amiibo and whatnot, and other examples like Bayonetta etc. so I can't see where someone who tries to reason with that are coming from other than not being up to date with the subject.

    It's true that there would be more room for tech specs improvement in the game, but it may not be where the game is headed, since Yoshi in this recent interview seemed more interested in other aspects of visual improvement rather than tech specs:



    But then again, even if they tried to push forward in the tech specs, they would risk losing the players who yet remain on the PS4 for possibly a long while after the next generation consoles release. And yet again, Yoshi keeps saying that they want the game to be playing through as many platforms as possible, and the Switch has a considerable amount of players I'm guessing SE may want to include in their player base. So from what I see, they would either try to make it playable on every console including the Switch to keep the low, average and the high tech spec hardware players or just abandon the people who could not afford to play FFXIV due to the decision to keep the game for a higher spec hardware player base. From Yoshi's words, that they want to keep it on as many platforms as possible, I understand that Yoshi is more interested in the availability rather than the increase in graphical fidelity.

    As for how you feel regarding people who want the game to be on the Switch being people who don't care about the game and just care about the console, I don't agree with it, simply because I myself, may have a different perspective as to what may be beneficial to it in the long run and if Yoshi and his team see that it is the right thing to do due to the business and marketing strategies they wish to make for the sake of the game, even if it means gaining more audience through sacrificing a matter for another, I support. Not everyone is a crazed Nintendo fanatic simply because he/she wants the game on the platform, it may just be that they simply don't agree with you,
    (0)
    Last edited by TheVigilant; 12-05-2018 at 07:31 PM.

  2. #392
    Player
    LalaRu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    2,408
    Character
    Mi An
    World
    Phantom
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Husain View Post
    ... from what I see, they would either try to make it playable on every console including the Switch to keep the low, average and the high tech spec hardware players or just abandon the people who could not afford to play FFXIV due to the decision to keep the game for a higher spec hardware ...
    I think XIV 1.0 was a lesson in that sense: high spec = commercial failure.
    (4)

  3. #393
    Player
    Enla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    2,748
    Character
    Crushing Fatigue
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by LalaRu View Post
    I think XIV 1.0 was a lesson in that sense: high spec = commercial failure.
    But conversely, this MMO is a lesson in that keeping your game chained down by outdated (or with the inevitability of becoming outdated) hardware isn't ideal either. It wasn't just because of a lack of graphical fidelity that the team constantly slagged the PS3 port. It fundamentally restricted a lot of what they could do in terms of improvements for the game at large because the PS3 could barely run the game once it hit Heavensward.
    (1)

  4. #394
    Player
    LalaRu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    2,408
    Character
    Mi An
    World
    Phantom
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Enla View Post
    But conversely, this MMO is a lesson in that keeping your game chained down by outdated (or with the inevitability of becoming outdated) hardware isn't ideal either...
    You're right. I think the "sweet spot" is between low and high specs. Not too low for the graphic appeal, and not too high to avoid lose customers without high-end machines.
    (2)

  5. #395
    Player
    Lastelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    937
    Character
    Lastelli Sungsem
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Husain View Post
    So from what I see, they would either try to make it playable on every console including the Switch to keep the low, average and the high tech spec hardware players or just abandon the people who could not afford to play FFXIV due to the decision to keep the game for a higher spec hardware player base. From Yoshi's words, that they want to keep it on as many platforms as possible, I understand that Yoshi is more interested in the availability rather than the increase in graphical fidelity.
    There were 85 mlns of ps3 around and many people were still playing on the ps3 when they decided to cut the support for the platform because it was keeping the game back (and the switch is not much more powerful than the ps3). Clearly, all publishers would like to release their games for as many platforms as possible...but there's a problem.
    If a publisher decides to release a game for hw with very different capabilities, the game will be developed with the lowest common denominator in mind. This not only means worse graphics, it also means less technically demanding content (say goodbye to large scale content, bigger and more alive areas, better AI, for instance). And here's the problem: there's no guarantee that the players on the more powerful platform will be ok with this. Think about the whole diablo mobile fiasco. Sometimes devs just need to choose one target hardware and do the best they can withing the boundaries of that hardware. If a game or a franchise is historically linked to a platform and its playerbase is on a specific platform, trying to go after a new platform and a new target is extremely risky whenever the game will need to be adjusted for the new hw. In ffxiv case, there's a lot that can be improved and is already below modern standards, things that the playerbase has been asking for some time now, and many times the devs replied with "ps3 limitations" or "server limitations". You can be sure that many players will be pretty upset if the devs create another constraint for themselves by making a switch version.

    Quote Originally Posted by LalaRu View Post
    You're right. I think the "sweet spot" is between low and high specs. Not too low for the graphic appeal, and not too high to avoid lose customers without high-end machines.
    Correct, and this is true for any game. Unfortunately, "switch level" is just too low for this game.
    There are games that are perfectly fine for the switch, but ffxiv is not one of those games and for its own good I hope that the only reason why yoshida mentioned the possibility of a switch port was because he just didn't want to say "no way" and annoy someone. After all yoshida says a lot of things that ultimately amount to nothing.
    (1)

  6. #396
    Player
    JunseiKei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The Mist, Ward 9, Plot 2
    Posts
    1,800
    Character
    Xoria Tepes
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigma-Astra View Post
    Not necessarily, all they would have to do is ask SE to heavily censor and make a special version for Switch users that's localized and edited enough where all of that is covered with fluffy sprinkles and cotton candy nonsense. And we all know that Nintendo would ask that to be done too. I think you underestimate Nintendo's persistence to have their demands met and SE's love of extra income from other companies as the bait and motivation to allow it.
    That makes no sense for making a censored version just for the Switch. A port is not quite the same as what China and Korea have, which are heavily censored.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lastelli View Post
    Well, Nintendo changed a lot in the last few years. We now have brands like bayonetta, and some recent games (arms and even botw) are clearly trying to cater to a more adult and /or "naughty" audience.
    Nintendo has a few mature rated games on its older consoles. Seriously, have you guys forgotten about Resident Evil 4, Killer 7, Conker's Bad Fur Day, Eternal Darkness, Wolfenstein II, Perfect Dark? Heck, Mortal Kombat, Fallout and Doom were on the SNES. There's probably a few games on the NES that would have been rated mature, but the ESRB did not exist then (thanks Mortal Kombat). Nintendo is not just suddenly catering to the more mature audience. It's always been there, but it's not its most advertised audience.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lastelli View Post
    That's not the problem though, since ffxiv has very low chances of being ported to the switch in the first place for obvious technical reasons.
    Agreed. I don't see FFXIV coming to the Switch at all.
    (0)
    9.23.2019 [11:15 p.m.]Total Play Time: 1552 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes - You'll be hard-pressed to find a more cynical person than me.
    Quote Originally Posted by Odstarva View Post
    You people are never happy.
    [...] You complain and complain and complain.

  7. #397
    Player
    Delmontyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,335
    Character
    Brin Zalazar
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Airget View Post
    This is the important question. After dropping PS3 SE wouldn't fallback and support a system that is weaker than PS4. However if Nintendo Switch is stronger or as powerful as the PS4 then it's possible.
    Or cloud streaming...
    (0)
    Work To Game on YouTube [Guides, and More]...
    https://www.youtube.com/c/worktogamevideos

    Host on AetheryteRadio... Boom City!
    Petition for Microsoft to allow XIV with cross system play:
    https://www.change.org/p/phil-spence...atform-servers

  8. #398
    Player
    SerLuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,139
    Character
    Luke Lightbringer
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    I really hate the whole “lol Nintendo is just for casuals and kiddies” thing. I love Nintendo games the same way I love Disney, it’s something everyone can enjoy. I’m 34 and I love Wreck it Ralph, Up, The Legend of Zelda, and Super Mario.
    (1)

  9. #399
    Player
    Sigma-Astra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,085
    Character
    Soma Kagami
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Lastelli View Post
    Well, Nintendo changed a lot in the last few years. We now have brands like bayonetta, and some recent games (arms and even botw) are clearly trying to cater to a more adult and /or "naughty" audience.
    Ah, you're right. I almost forgot about Bayonetta and whatnot. Good call.

    I feel like people wishing for a switch port don't really care about the game and only care about the console.
    Yea, that's how I feel too, so I can understand you there.

    Quote Originally Posted by Husain View Post
    And I'm sorry that you don't always have things the way you want them to be in life and that you're not the center of the world.
    Actually, that comment would be more fitting for you since you keep rehashing the same, tired, old line that the Switch would be possible simply because Yoshi was in talks about doing it and running that as a 100% certainty when it's not while ignoring mostly what everyone else has been saying and that it just wouldn't technically be there as the main reasoning among other estimates.

    As much as you see your side as being logical, I see mine as being logical too.
    You're not being logical, you're just being hopeful and wishful thinking because you want something that has been proven to not technically work, and you don't want to hear that from others. You're also using your opinion as an excuse to be extremely rude and condescending towards someone else that doesn't share the same opinion as you when I haven't done either of those things to you in response so far. The world doesn't revolve around what you want on the forums either, maybe you're the one who needs to learn that life lesson and not respond poorly when someone tells you "no."
    (1)

  10. #400
    Player
    Derio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,367
    Character
    Derio Uzumaki
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 100
    Please no. I have a nintendo switch and the pure downgrade of what they had to do to port warframe to the game was insane. I dont wish that for ffxiv. Especially considering new consoles are coming out most likely after shadowbringers but before the next expansion after shadowbringers.

    Plus I dont see nintendo changing their minds on the online subscription cost to play online games.
    (0)

Page 40 of 47 FirstFirst ... 30 38 39 40 41 42 ... LastLast