You came onto a relatively public forum expecting to find an echo chamber of "yes I agree" remarks. You got upset when people said "no I disagree." Instead of debating those points you resorted to dismissing the opinions of others because you weren't interested in dialogue, just affirmation of your own views. Your actions have been trying to seek validation, and now victimization, merits of defeat in a debate.
You're putting words in my mouth. Here, I'll spell it out for you:
Being inaccurate and erroneous (made in error) does not equal invalid. Your opinion is not invalid, but inaccurate and ill-informed. When presented with evidence to the contrary, you retreat away from this point.
nothing that I can recall that has been said towards you has been an attack on your character. If you really think all you are is your opinions, stop selling yourself short. You may be a better crafter / gatherer / pvp-er / RP-er / whatever-er than myself or anyone else on this forum/game. But if you're offended that people are saying that you're wrong, without either wanting to justify why you felt right in spite of this, trying to have a back and forth and debate the merit of your points, and instead resort to what you've been doing... I don't know what to tell you.
Saying you're wrong is not saying you're worthless.
EDIT::
Here, I'll even prove my point.
You have as much a right as anyone else to express the game and your satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the game. I'm upset with Pagos. Plenty of other people are as well. SE sees the amount of people upset by this content and try to make it better for the players.
My point? Get enough people to agree on the points you're making and eventually those changes you seek may very well be implemented. But if the things you want only appeal to you don't get upset if people, naturally, disagree with how you feel.
Glamour's been a hot button issue for a long time. SE heard the complaints and finally implemented the glamour dresser, removed the myriad glamour prisms and made them all single-purpose items. So, there is proof to what I'm saying.



Reply With Quote

