Alleo's Signature

[Rymm]

And a longer amount of time keeping a house for someone who has it, that still accomplishes the goal of removing houses from those who are not using them anymore, is objectively better. It accomplishes both things and is more lenient for those who have already paid their dues.

So why not a year, then? That's even more lenient for those who have already paid their dues. Longer is better after all. Hey! Why not two years?? It'll still open up the houses... eventually.

You are right about patch cycles not being arbitrary, I'll concede that one. But it still doesn't mean they should have any influence over the housing timer.