Quote Originally Posted by Rymm View Post
In your opinion. Opinions aren't facts, so please don't try to present them as such. Everyone has the right to their own opinions, but they are the very antithesis of objective. Go to the housing forums and you'll find some posters who want it dropped to a flat 1 month. How does your opinion carry more weight than theirs?

And as I said before, content patches have no bearing on the housing argument. There are plenty of things in game to keep you busy between patch drops. Just because you opt not to do them doesn't mean they cease to exist.
Content patches do have to do with the word arbitrary, though. Arbitrary means chosen at random or by whim. Choosing an amount of time based on patch cycle is not arbitrary.

And a longer amount of time keeping a house for someone who has it, that still accomplishes the goal of removing houses from those who are not using them anymore, is objectively better. It accomplishes both things and is more lenient for those who have already paid their dues.