Results 1 to 10 of 51

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Tetsaru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    331
    Character
    Tetsaru Arigashi
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 80
    Ok, soooo, lemme get this straight...

    DotH and DotL abilities are going to be learned strictly through leveling... ok...

    We're going to get "refunds" for all the DotH and DothL abilities we've purchased with Guild Marks...

    ...But the future of using Guild Marks themselves is still up in the air...

    So instead of being able to use moves like Hands of the Gods on my Armorer, my highest and main DotH class, by only having to get Alchemist to 36, doing all 3 of the guild quests, and then paying my 12K Guild Marks for the ability (like I originally planned to do), does that mean I'll have to level Alchemy all the way up to 50 now to use Hands of the Gods on my Armorer? Getting a single DotH to 50 (which I still have yet to do) takes forever as it is, and right now, Alchemist isn't very viable, cept for making shards and crystals for other things...

    I'm glad that they're getting rid of the Eluder moves though, those things were useless.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    BruceyBruceyBangBang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,678
    Character
    Boye Fran
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Tetsaru View Post
    So instead of being able to use moves like Hands of the Gods on my Armorer, my highest and main DotH class, by only having to get Alchemist to 36, doing all 3 of the guild quests, and then paying my 12K Guild Marks for the ability (like I originally planned to do), does that mean I'll have to level Alchemy all the way up to 50 now to use Hands of the Gods on my Armorer? Getting a single DotH to 50 (which I still have yet to do) takes forever as it is, and right now, Alchemist isn't very viable, cept for making shards and crystals for other things...
    There is a strong possibility for that. Of course, none of us can really say for certain, but a safe and logical assumption says so.
    (0)