Quote Originally Posted by Awha View Post
Do not think anyone is against bringing up issues with the current system or the rules. Issue lies with those who also want SE to punish players retroactively for policies and or rules that may or may not exist within the current frame work that have no history of being enforced.
I don't think the goal here for anyone is punishment, though what you consider to be punishment may be someone else's goal. It's simply a guess, but I imagine most players consider it "correct" for a single player not to have multiple houses. For some of these players, it would be "correct" for SE to take away those additional houses. This is not a punishment, but a correction in what is currently incorrect, and has nothing to do with the player themselves that is responsible in some way for this incorrect situation.

I think many would be fine for a player that is behaving "incorrectly" to simply be corrected, and not banned or punished otherwise.

Many are posing their own form of correction disregarding the player, to remove the incentive for a player to perform in that incorrect manner, rather than to simply "police" the behavior. I think flaws and merits can be seen in both corrections, and perhaps they can be used together in some capacity.

This thread didn't start out about any specific player. It took specific player(s) themselves to make it about themselves for discussions about those specific player(s) to arise. At the end of the day no one cares what strangers are punished or not, only that justice and truth prevail, and that all systems are running smoothly.