Results -9 to 0 of 170

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player

    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    3,327
    Quote Originally Posted by Aviars View Post
    Snip . . .
    I agree a car has an objective material value, that goes beyond the name. We both agree that if someone calls a lambo a civic they should still pay full price. Now you feel your top 100 mount has objective value outside fact it was given as a top 100 reward. All the parts make it a lambo not just the name. Your top 100 reward is simply a brand the item itself has nothing special about it that makes it top 100. We cannot even say intent makes it unique, for all we know SE can be sitting on these designs and they just pulled a few out their ass and said this will make a good pvp reward. Every part of a lambo is made to be a lambo. Can you say the same? You did not say you can call a honda civic a lambo and charge people 500k for it, but that is more or less what you doing since nothing outside of the fact they were rewarded as a top 100 reward nothing else makes that item objectively unique to PvP or a top 100 reward. Can we really say the same for the car? Even if lambo never existed and you were pay 500 simply because they say it is fancy top line of sports car but looks no different then any other car on the street? Properly not, so why should those that want the item care that it was a top 100 reward?

    I mean the PvE rewards are based around the encounter at least they have that claim, the pvp stuff they could have easily just put them in the golden saucer and you would not be able to tell the difference if they were never part of pvp.
    (4)
    Last edited by Awha; 06-23-2018 at 05:00 PM.