And so it begins again

[Miste]

You quite clearly care very much.

I care about posting my opinions and challenging people when they make claims with no facts. In general challenging people to prove their claims when it reeks of exaggeration like your OP.

There isn't much point in my replying to this. You obviously have some sort of underlying issue with me from a previous debate I'm not even sure I remember

I mean...if you are not going to read my replies then of course there is no point in you bothering to reply. Since you end up posting things that are completely incorrect even though I already explained myself to you.

I dislike when people post paranoid exaggerations which if you know my post history you'll see more of it. Exiled_Tonberry knows since I used to nag at her about getting too paranoid and making exaggerations or claiming stuff that can't be proven.

You aren't a special case, Lunaxia. If anyone else posted this same thread, guess what? I'd be here to challenge them.

It isn't about you no matter how much you think it is. It is about what you posted in this thread's OP.

I may choose my words differently and be more blunt because of what happened in the past since I honestly think you can handle it with all that salty ad hominem you threw at me back then; it's fine if you don't remember I don't care, but I'd still be here if the OP wasn't made by you so don't kid yourself.

I just found it amusing you seemed offended by my opinion that you are lying to exaggerate the situation; something that isn't even close to how rude you were to me in the past /shrug

So I decided to explain why I was so blunt and open with my opinion on this since you kept bringing up the "liar" thing as such a huge sticking point in most of your posts in here.

If my assertion is vague to you because I don't gather screenshots and statistics and note times in preparation for internet arguments, then that's your problem.

I didn't say post screenshots of the ones you initially saw because you already said you didn't take any. Again, actually reading what I post will help you in actually replying properly.

I said your explanation is vague because you can't even recall in your MIND how many groups you saw in PF excluding WHM to answer questions being posed to you in here.

If this was such a big deal did you not even count them when you apparently kept seeing more of them?? You don't even have a recollection at all?

Like others have said...you said a "large amount of groups" are excluding WHMs since the patch dropped.

This thread was made over 2 days ago...you could have taken some screenshots after you posted it since people were questioning your claims.

You claimed it was a large amount of groups so how come you won't go take screenshots?? They must be there in the PF if you believe your own claim right? Even someone from Chaos above took screenshots of the PF, why can't you to prove what you claimed in OP??

But if you're waiting for me to say my own eyes were wrong to please you, you'll be waiting a while.

Nope...and hopefully this is the last time I need to explain this to you...because at this point it seems you are being willfully obtuse.

Mandatory AST placement has returned, and a large number of groups are dropping the pretense altogether and are back to excluding WHM entirely for SCH/ AST.

I'm waiting for you to prove this claim you made.

So do it or concede you have no facts to back up your claim.