And I agree that going after mods as a whole isn't the answer: report the people abusing the mod. However if enough people abuse the mod that it catches attention and causes action to be made, then that's not the fault of the people who did what they're supposed to do and report/discuss people abusing said mods. A lot of the people here are putting blame on the people feeling uncomfortable, not on the people abusing the mod.
No, only some people feel that way. People like Clover for example are well aware that their characters are just characters, yet they still feel odd that their characters are being perceived in a way that wasn't intended. And assuming that you should only care if you do think your avatar is an extension of you is kind of...weird (though I recognize that's subjective). I mean you share screenshots and proudly display your character on your forum sig, so clearly you care that somebody other than you perceives your character the way you want (perhaps because you're proud or it makes you happy). You just don't care if they're seen naked. There's a big difference between having different lines to cross than to simply state "well they're not you so you shouldn't care at all."
Most people on this forum do care how their characters are perceived to varying degrees, including in this very thread. If we didn't, we wouldn't debate over raid gear and dungeon gear designs and how they look on certain races/jobs. We wouldn't want better quality Mogstation items. We wouldn't care about character creation capabilities. Everyone could run around as bald Midlander Males and not a complaint would be seen. And there absolutely wouldn't be so many screenshot threads made precisely to share your characters with other people.
As for this mod itself, many people have stated that it's used so that you can see your s/o or be seen by your s/o. In other words: those people care if other people can see their character is naked. In other words the character isn't them, yet suddenly their reason for wanting someone else to see them in a specific way is valid while for dissenters it's not.
That's being hypocritical, and why I personally have a problem with that particular argument. If it's important to someone that someone they care about uses the mod so that their character can be seen naked, then it's just as important for people who want nothing to do with the mod to be peeved that can be seen naked regardless of what they say or do.
Completely agree.
Please don't apologize! This post was an excellent responseI'm all for big discussions like this.
I don't approve of going after mods as a whole, for many of the reasons you stated. As I've said before I do play the Sims, and absolutely can't play Sims 4 without my mods. So I 100% understand why people want them and want to defend them. Modding helps gaming. There are far too many examples where hacking and modding helped the industry evolve. Pokemon comes to mind and the discovery of hidden IVs, as well as fan translation patches of foreign games that lead to growing international audiences. The modding scene isn't inherently bad (quite the opposite!), and so I do hope that people like OP can come to realize that most people don't have ill intentions when using such mods. Nor is it even remotely fair to punish the majority because of a few bad eggs.
Totally not a problem!I'll be the first to admit I don't quite understand the development side of this issue (though I'm sure you saw that), which is why I stuck more to discussing the other stuff. That being said I'm happy to learn, so I'm glad you did come forward with that aspect to bring a different perspective to the thread.
I feel the same, both about this topic in general and your posts. So thank you for taking the time!



I'm all for big discussions like this.


