Healer adjustment in 4.05

[Rubiss]

Adlo changes aren't needed. The reason for the shield disparity between Noct AST and SCH is due to the fact that SCH has a 1700-2100 free HPS bot flying around throwing around hundreds of thousands of HP worth of healing and freeing up dozens of healer GCDs for dps. SCH hands-down, even in it's "nerfed" state, has more output than any other healer is capable of doing in raid setting sans balance. Noct AST's shields are pretty much novelty compared to scholar utility and practicality.

That fairy is at the expense of healing power. SCH doesn't have a spammable Medica or a Medica 2 equivalent nor a spammable Cure 2. SCH is good at burst healing and flexible healing. Their actual healing power is low. Adloquium should not have a lower potency and cost more while also having a cast time versus the superior Aspected Benefic. That's just stupid. Adlo should either cost less than Aspected Benefic or have higher potency. One of the two. If you think SCH has the highest HPS, then you clearly do not actually play SCH and if you do, you do not have actual data. And no one cares about your A12S parses. In a fight so easy which can be solo healed within the first few weeks of coming out, the inflated numbers from that is not really important.

[CreinCrein]

That fairy is at the expense of healing power. SCH doesn't have a spammable Medica or a Medica 2 equivalent nor a spammable Cure 2. SCH is good at burst healing and flexible healing. Their actual healing power is low.

I didn't say SCH had more HPS, I said it had more output. Link one source, time by time, percentile by percentile log where a noct AST exceeds a SCH in both damage and HPS simultaneously; you can't because Noct requires you to waste dozens of GCDs doing what eos can do by herself. It wasn't uncommon to have SCH mainheal in speed clears either because their opportunity cost per spell is so low compared to other healers, allowing more uptime for their co-heals to DPS. Creator was also piss easy so I tried to optimize it for fun? You literally have no logs, nothing to show for how much you're spewing leading me to believe you have 0 idea what you're talking about .-.

[Furious]

I didn't say SCH had more HPS, I said it had more output. Link one source, time by time, percentile by percentile log where a noct AST exceeds a SCH in both damage and HPS simultaneously; you can't because Noct requires you to waste dozens of GCDs doing what eos can do by herself. It wasn't uncommon to have SCH mainheal in speed clears either because their opportunity cost per spell is so low compared to other healers, allowing more uptime for their co-heals to DPS. Creator was also piss easy so I tried to optimize it for fun? You literally have no logs, nothing to show for how much you're spewing leading me to believe you have 0 idea what you're talking about .-.

In what subjective timeframe do you consider output and hps to be different, since they are a measure of exactly the same thing?