Ok but quoting to then just argue or bash a person is very rude. Then again this forum is the most toxic of all FF forums out there


Ok but quoting to then just argue or bash a person is very rude. Then again this forum is the most toxic of all FF forums out there
Its definitely not the most toxic. Especially not because people quote each other. Honestly, after reading your "argument" I can tell you that while he was abrasive, you were much more "toxic" as you refused to have any discussion and immediately attacked him.
You obviously don't know anything about forum sites if you think quoting someone to argue with them is rude, because this is something people do on forum sites all. The. Time. Its less confusing and much easier to follow that way.
Sorry you don't like people replying to you directly when they disagree with you, but that's something you need to get over if you are going to be on a forum site.
I didn't quote you just to "bash" you, I legitimately wanted to know what you meant by your initial comment because I could not (still can't) figure out any way it actually makes sense from a game balance perspective.
If you aren't putting enough thought into your posts that you can explain them, or you can but simply aren't willing to, then you probably shouldn't contribute them to the thread. If your opinion is uninformed or not well thought out its not actually worth anything and until you can formulate your thoughts in a straightforward way that makes sense you're not ready to contribute to a discussion. Attacking someone for questioning your opinion or asking you to explain yourself is also incredibly unproductive. If you take all that to mind when you post you won't get "bashed" by people.


You clearly stated multiple times i basically did not know what i was even talking about...
I even apologized about my statement, god like seriously.. Yes perhaps i did misread your post but it had sounded like an insult.
Why I thought nerfing is not the solution to all the problems, it just shows there are bigger issues at hand if the solution is to "nerf". That is all i was getting at.
Besides if you had not even bothered to read my 2nd posting i did actually talk more and it was about healing. Stormblood was their opportunity to balance the healers, hence why non were introduced. Maybe nerfing is the quickest but in the long run,, well like i said they where mean't to start "Fresh" to balance healers
Balancing is not buffing jobs that were already fairly great
OP asked if Ast needed a buff, that's it....

Does AST really need this buff - prolly... It's an expansion with a gear reset. If the new bosses don't hit like trucks I'll be surprised and disappointed.

What on earth are you talking about? In every forum in existence, there exists a quote function to provide contextual reference to the reply given (if nothing else; to set context for whom the reply is in regard to). Which forums do you go to where people talk to themselves and hope others know why they are talking to?
Arguing and discussing are essentially synonyms, with one having a potentially (but not necessarily) harsher tone implied. Quoting "to bash a person" isn't rude at all; insulting them is, but without the quote to show who it was aimed at it would be rather nonsensical.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote




