The bold is the heart of the matter and where people seem to be confused about what that word actually means. No side of the argument is "right" in every way on it. You, and everyone else who views it that way, are 100% right to say that players should show courtesy to others by doing what they reasonably can to make something better/smoother/faster. In other words, play decently as a team player. You don't have to kill yourself over trying to min/max literally everything you do, despite what some people think. I think that's where people saying to "play at your best" don't understand how word choice is important... don't use "best" without stated context.
Where the confusion on the matter comes from though (where they're wrong) is an unrealistic expectation of it. That courtesy is not an option, it's apparently a mandate to people here. Should people be courteous? Yes, absolutely. Is everyone going to be that way? F*** NO! What kind of made up utopia reality are people living in if they think that? Hell, even assuming "most" to be like that would be evidence enough to think someone is disconnected with reality, because you deny the likelihood of meeting the bad people (generally an inevitable fate).
Thus comes reflecting on courtesy. It's a two-way street that caters to more than just playstyle. Why not show a random stranger that, as far as we can tell, isn't a d-bag (said player is nice or fulfilling their role fine) some courtesy on your end? Wouldn't you let a friend laze a bit if they told you they were tired or whatever excuse? Hell, what if they weren't even in your party and you knew they were in that state while playing with randoms. Would you go out of your way to lecture them about their responsibility to uphold courtesy? I'd imagine said friend may have a negative social outlook about you after that. Courtesy is universal, right?
The reason why this argument even exists is because of a failure to accept reality. One denies logic and sound argument the moment they detach themselves from what is inevitably going to happen. As a result, many people gain unreasonable expectations of what needs to be, rather than what would simply be "ideal". What's equally disheartening to people defending the minimum are people that defend unreasonable expectations and ignore self accountability. I don't know if you are part of the latter, but there certainly are people defending it in this topic. Any occasion this subject is brought up, out comes mouth breathers with beliefs that are on-par with someone dumb enough to think you need to min/max Sastasha story. Not everything in a game needs to be taken as a literal life or death situation. You don't need to turn up your nose at someone for simply playing in a way you don't encourage if it's not interfering with success. We should encourage better play. Simultaneously however, we don't need to be douchebags about people that do their assigned roles and aren't causing groups to fail... courtesy, right?
Last edited by Welsper59; 06-08-2017 at 09:18 AM.
Oh my goodness it's 80 pages!
![]()
It was a lot to read, but basically yea, I always try to keep posts relatively small and to keep it simple but I believe what you said illustrates what I feel, Don't mandate courtesy is pretty much my stance. Besides it is almost paradoxical, mandating courtesy isn't very courteous
“Even the finest sword plunged into salt water will eventually rust.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
That's a terrible analogy. If anything it's backwards. One person does everything, and the rest of the group just sits there on their phones because the "leader" thinks they are too incompetent to help, and they take no interest in the project. Thus the leader carries everyone. Next time a school project comes up, everyone wants that leader to carry them. Speaking from experience here as that person carrying the deadweight, in such projects I'd ask the teacher to just let me do the project myself because "the other people you partnered me with express no interest in this project, let alone this class"
The right analogy is the cooking class, where you are assigned groups and you can not do the entire project yourself within the time limit. In high school one person was assigned to wash and dry dishes as they are used so that they could get out of the class earlier. Because I got the equivilent of the "bad PUG" table every time where they would rarely even show up to class, I got to do most assignments solo. Once in a while I got dropped into someone elses group because one of their group was legitimately sick, and thus assigned to wash and dry dishes because that's the only role they felt expendable from their team synergy. You know, the one that controls how if they leave class in time.
If I've established a pattern of anything, is that I'm skeptical about the competence of people I'm in a group with until they prove otherwise. Hence in FFXIV, I stick to healing until I see competence, and most PUG's are somewhere between "passable" and "good", while raiders are usually the most incompetent. The most incompetent group I've had so far was a group of three from a raider guild on another server, who ignored the mechanics of everything.
That's funny but terribly out of character. The same thing would happen if they were all raider healers, they would all put up regen and medica II and then fail the duty when they never switch out of CS.
Do you still not know what sarcasm is? That entire second paragraph denoted by ~, the one you took as serious. Raiders have repeatedly said they use stone skin when they know a tankbuster is coming up, so please, keep trolling.
Now it will be "Because Yoshi-P said so because Mr.Happy Asked", do you all see the problem with walkthroughs, guides and video tutorials? Mr.Happy likely has to redo all his videos for all the 2.0, 3.0 and now 4.0 content because of these changes, because all the skill changes makes most of these videos advice no longer viable. Sure you may still know what the mechanics are, but more than one person in this thread I'm sure is in the "omg, a newbie, did you watch a video, otherwise I'm going to kick" camp because that seems to be the mantra of raiders "be perfect or get lost"
I do not understand how someone can be this.. idk, someone being detached from reality.
Still waiting to hear you explain why a shield using healer out dps - 2 dps, and a tank while the pure healer that had regens did not manage to outheal the AST while doing less dps then a range lb
Last edited by Ama_Hamada; 06-08-2017 at 09:53 AM.
It's really sad how much you show how you really are. It's nothing but trolling and full of toxic acts.
And sure, this person here say its fine for tanks to not use cooldown or maim combo etc. This quote really states her/his opinion on it too, in fact you been part of it before as well.
Everyone has their own opinon, which is fine. But this person also stated it's fine to wipe in raids for very long time or farm groups, because it's fun. Many keep forgetting it's not fun for the rest of the group either. It's neither fun when 3/7/23 people pull their hardest (which can be from 75-85% optimized) and they have 1 person slacking. You both have right for your own opinion but you both talk like it's all about you or them. It really isn't. When I play with others, I play for the group and not myself, so please keep the toxic attitude away.
Again - Nobody expect extreme standar gameplay in any content, they want people to contribute -as much- as they do. Sitting around healing every 20 seconds isn't contributing at all, it's far from it. If you expect yourself to play like that, don't even expect others to do their job either as in, contributing for the group. Tank using CD helps healers, DPS killing things faster, contributes for both healer and tank. Less CD use, less healing = more MP. If healer contributes with the best mitigation in game, which is dead boss or adds. Nobody expects perfect gameplay either, but yet, you Thunda act like it (check the quote I quoted you on).
You said it's also a myth healers have downtime, you never responded to this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBgM...youtu.be&t=565
The sad part is many in here, extremely many in here are actually thinking this is fine. It's funny they all say people who ask to contribute to the group, are elitist, toxic etc. When they sit on their butt expecting others to play well and they don't do anything. Did you guys know being ego is actually toxic? Well now you know.
Last edited by akaneakki; 06-08-2017 at 10:15 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|