I like how in the live letters instead of questions like: "will the devs be open to sugestions to make smn feel more like a summoner class?", "why shield oath isnt given at lv 30?", "why they insist of not giving any potency to pld's flash?", "wont they give bards their mobility back so players who chose bard on 2.0 can still feel like they are playing the class they chose?"; and other questions like that, we get instead for the live letters questions related to peaches and stuff that was already answered in previous live letters... makes me think they pick the easy and dumb questions from the threads on purpose...
Still, I am all in for Nalien's suggestion, it would help a lot the issue of the "feel" of the smns, hell, if it is a lack of funding the reason, make it a mogstation thing, it will be an annoying yes, but still, it isnt something "necessary" to the class and purely cosmetic. of course i will rather have it be an option in the game from the beginning but hey...
while talking about egis, tbh i would like to have at least 1 more egi, a support one, maybe a moogle king egi, that can give tp and mp like a brd or mch, of course its dps would be lower compared to other egis and slightly lower when it is singing/dancing, but no other kind of buffs to the party, as buffing the party would feel like something a sch fairy should do, and it still would somewhat fill in what a smn could do in previous games, as some summons had a secondary or purely support effect. I say this because of the situation i have in my static, the bard doesnt really want to play bard or mechanist anymore, because as they said, "they chopped off their legs and turned them into a bowmage", but since it is the only 2 classes that can give tp and mp, she is stuck with it, but having that option on smn might allow for her to switch to another class.
Also i still want more skills/spells that interact with the egi :P