Quote Originally Posted by Kaitoo View Post
there is new strawman, its, again, a simple fact that that kind of behaivor exist in pve too but its not punished like that way.
Yes, it is a strawman. You are, AGAIN, making an argument against a claim that has not been made. This behaviour is not punished this way in PvE because it is very, very rare in PvE. That should be obvious - the cases are few and far between, so there's no point in taking drastic measures against it. For the very same reason, frontlines does not get a chat restriction - the toxicity isn't as bad there, so SE does not restrict chat there. It hasn't been as bad in Wolves Den either, or they would have attempted to implement that feature earlier. It's NOT PvP as such. It's only the Feast and I bet with that they mean RANKED feast. Ranked is the source of the surge in toxicity that made them consider this option, there is no way around that. And that is precisely why removing people's rating would be a very efficient punishment for abuse.

You also mistake "being unable to cope" with "inefficient". When PvE has 1% toxicity and ranked 70% (Numbers arbitrary to get the point across), it's far easier to just disable chat in ranked, because handling the cases is a disproportionate amount of effort.