
Originally Posted by
LilLemay
I'd hardly say it falls short of the mark.
Given that WAR is without a doubt the best OT, and that PLD is almost definitely the strongest MT, with the strongest defensive cooldowns, the best damage mitigation, and despite what everyone thinks can still put out decent dps (I normally parse about 1k - 1.2k as a MT in a9s - a11s) I hardly see the reason to take a DRK at all. The extra 100, 200 maybe dps you'd gain from taking a DRK isn't going to make much of a difference, nor should your party's dps be at the point where the MT doing amazing dps is what's making or breaking a dps check clear. Also in the light of PLD's utility capabilities, it's superior ''super'' cooldown (Hallowed), and it's raw damage mitigation it's more suited to taking repeated punches to the face than a DRK is anyway
It doesn't really matter that DRK can do a bit more dps when a PLD can make BOTH the healer AND the dps lives easier with DV, meaning your OffHealer has more time to push some dps and your main healer spends less time pulling their hair out trying to keep the MT and the rest of the party alive
As a straight OT, no you probably don't want a PLD, but given the nature of most savage content, there's at least a few tank swaps, and given that PLD is the best MT and WAR is the best OT, I'd say it's DRK that falls short of the mark if anything.
To clarify, I'm pretty sure all the tanks are viable for an MT role, I just think PLD fulfills MT better and WAR fulfills OT better