There Is No Dancer (yet)

[Xiao_]

Is the concept of "cinematic action" or "cutscene" that hard to understand ?

So I suppose we'll receive the Ranger job since, in the ARR Opening, we saw the Mi'Qote creating a shield to protect the Warrior. And we'll also get the Devout from CNJ, that will infuse elemental magic into weapons, or a buff to Steel Cyclone because we clearly saw it bypassing Ravana's shield...and a buff to Holmgang, to use on multiple targets...and a new BLM skill to instantly charge a MNK limit break...which is obviously not Final Heaven since it clearly strikes in an AoE...

this is absolutely valid and honestly the best argument against. a lot of things happen in cutscenes that we will never have the opportunity to do

Though we should all know by now that people like yourself will be the first to fly to the forums and scream in countless threads, berating S.E. for 'backtracking' on dancer because it was 'CONFIRMED!'

you literally can't, or don't read huh? allow me to quote, since you apparently missed it the first time:
"if you scroll back a few pages, i state that there's no real proof either way which is why we're free to speculate"

can you read that? the only people i see here belligerently screaming over the forums are OP and you, with your "WAHHHHH STOP SPECULATING" rhetoric. never once have i claimed that it's confirmed, or anything besides a possibility so what's gotten you so offended? and why even bother posting if you can't read replies?

[Dorander]

this is absolutely valid and honestly the best argument against. a lot of things happen in cutscenes that we will never have the opportunity to do



you literally can't, or don't read huh? allow me to quote, since you apparently missed it the first time:
"if you scroll back a few pages, i state that there's no real proof either way which is why we're free to speculate"

can you read that? the only people i see here belligerently screaming over the forums are OP and you, with your "WAHHHHH STOP SPECULATING" rhetoric. never once have i claimed that it's confirmed, or anything besides a possibility so what's gotten you so offended? and why even bother posting if you can't read replies?

Says the one person who has yet to even acknowledge what I've said. So, obviously you are the one who is completely incapable of reading or understanding the words. Do I need to use smaller ones for you to understand? I never said speculation needed to stop. I've said "stop forcing a narrative that doesn't exist" three times now.

Xiao_ need take facts that exist. Not what is rattling around braincase.

Is that clear and simple enough for you? Though I doubt it, since you'll retort with some other type of asinine attack.

[Reynhart]

this is absolutely valid and honestly the best argument against. a lot of things happen in cutscenes that we will never have the opportunity to do

That's why I posted that two pages ago :

You might want to study some tropes. ;-)