Why are low standards for dps acceptable?

[dragonkyn20]

I'm not sure about you, but I consider that embarrassing.

I'm not the one who ignores the obvious. I know how to play my job. I explore everything for anything new. So I have nothing to be embarrassed about.

[Kaurie]

I'm not really debunking who was the jerk first. Only that that they were both jerks. BLM was rude first. TC was asking stupid rhetorical questions instead of just asking a simple one like why the BLM was not using an ability. It all happened very fast. Why didn't the TC just ask in the first place? Why wait and then ask a bunch of silly questions. My first thought when a White mage doesn't use heal me soon enough, is not "Are you a bot?"

I may have misread, there have been a lot of posts in rapid succesion. I had the understanding you were saying the TC initiated conversation as a jerk and received a response in kind. In which case, discussion of who was a jerk first is relevant.

I agree that I would have worded things differently, but we all word and approach conflict in different ways. Some are better than others, but it doesn't make other ways wrong. I don't think the TC was incorrect in any way, and definitely did not deserve to be booted from the duty. The other members of the party exhibited a pretty toxic attitude that I thought banning parses and having an anti-harassment clause in the ToS was supposed to prevent.

I'm not the one who ignores the obvious. I know how to play my job. I explore everything for anything new. So I have nothing to be embarrassed about.

It was awhile, so I guess you forgot how this turned around. I claimed that it was embarrassing another person didn't realize they had new skills. You defended them saying not everyone notices the obvious, of which I followed up to say that is embarrassing. I don't think you need to be embarrassed. I think that if I was the other poster, I would be embarassed. It would be a story that I would post under thread title "Funny stories of times you done goofed" or "Things that you're embarrassed about" or whatever.

[Ciri_Wolf]

I may have misread, there have been a lot of posts in rapid succesion. I had the understanding you were saying the TC initiated conversation as a jerk and received a response in kind. In which case, discussion of who was a jerk first is relevant.

I agree that I would have worded things differently, but we all word and approach conflict in different ways. Some are better than others, but it doesn't make other ways wrong. I don't think the TC was incorrect in any way, and definitely did not deserve to be booted from the duty. The other members of the party exhibited a pretty toxic attitude that I thought banning parses and having an anti-harassment clause in the ToS was supposed to prevent.

I wouldn't say accusing someone of being a bot is a reason to be kicked. That's pretty mild imo. But the rest of the conversation is. BLM may have started it, but he kept it going. TC was just unlucky enough to run into a duo party.