Vote kick needs to be adjusted

[Ashelia_Ferron]

But you could restrict a little more the vote kick and it would still keep all of its pros.

Like I said in my previous post, make it so that you need more people for the "majority". In cases when one people is really harrassing, or in case where he's just AFK, it wouldn't be difficult to gather a few more "yes".

But then that means in a 4 man dungeon, if anyone brings just one friend along, they would be un-kickable

[Reynhart]

But then that means in a 4 man dungeon, if anyone brings just one friend along, they would be un-kickable

Yes, if anyone brings a friend and decides to be really toxic to the point where you wouldn't continue your duty, maybe you would need to vote abandon.
And if they're stupid enough to deny the abandon, thus wasting their time as much as yours, then maybe you would need to withdraw from the duty...

It's not like every duty goes that way...

[Eidolon]

But then that means in a 4 man dungeon, if anyone brings just one friend along, they would be un-kickable

Incorrect. They are still kickable. They have to bring two friends to be unkickable, and here's why:

You can still kick them if the other person in a 4-man party agrees with you. So let me give you an example.

Person A, Person B, Person, C, and Person D

A and B are freinds. C and D are random DF-pugs.

Person A is acting like a piece of ****.
Person C initiates a Vote Kick. Person D agrees, Person B Disagrees. Person A is kicked.

The only thing bringing a friend in 4-man means is that you're garunteed a successful vote kick if you vote dismiss. This is why my partner and I always vote kick first if we have issues with someone and take control of the dungoun.

[Ashelia_Ferron]

My post was in response to the person who said they wanted it to take more votes to kick

[Eidolon]

My post was in response to the person who said they wanted it to take more votes to kick

ah derp, lol. Thanks for pointing that out. xD