I love that *some* people in my FC have in their own way try to tell me to switch SCH and that it's better than WHM, or wont run with me if I'm bringing my whm lol. I guess eventually there will be a SCH vs WHM thread, if we haven't had that already.
Anyway, for my ilvl all aeros = 1100 per tick, that'll hold me over til I'm able to slam some Stone IIIs in. Holy is strong but that 1768MP..
Last edited by Twilite; 11-03-2015 at 10:34 PM.
Scholar is an amazing job, and definitely up there as one of the best. But it's not OP. Versatility =/= OP. If that was the case, no one would bother with either of the other healing jobs, it would always be dual Scholar.
As for Dissipation, people aren't specifically looking for it to be buffed, but for it to be changed. As it stands, it's designed to be a healing CD, and yet it's only beneficial purpose is to give AF stacks to enhance our DPS. As they've seperated Scholar and Summoner more this expansion, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense for our final ability to be so DPS related. Personally I don't mind the ability as it is, but to be a healing CD with the healing part completely ignored, it does seem like an ability that needs changing.
Not really, no. WHMs don't really make threads about how useless SCHs are (well, there was that one joke thread when the 'whm is inferior' threads were getting really out of hand XD).
It is possible that the sort of players who were making those threads envisioned their "enemies" as being jealous though XD
I thought that Dissipation was meant to boost SCH AOE healing. All the new skills synergize to boost SCH direct AOE healing. Probably not a big deal when healing with WHM, but maybe with an AST partner or just if you are solo healing.Scholar is an amazing job, and definitely up there as one of the best. But it's not OP. Versatility =/= OP. If that was the case, no one would bother with either of the other healing jobs, it would always be dual Scholar.
As for Dissipation, people aren't specifically looking for it to be buffed, but for it to be changed. As it stands, it's designed to be a healing CD, and yet it's only beneficial purpose is to give AF stacks to enhance our DPS.
"I don't always drink beer, but when I do, it's often."
Temp Forum Ban - July 7th 2016 *** I promise to never call out scrub players again due to it causing a toxic community
Dissipation adds a 20% healing buff to the Scholar at the cost of not being able to use a fairy for 30 seconds. It also gives 3 AF stacks. Now the loss of the fairy pretty much negates the extra healing power we get, and Lustrate and Indomitability (our 2 main burst single target and AoE heals) are classed as abilities and do not receive the 20% buff. Pair this up with the fact it costs 1768 mana to resummon the fairy, plus a Swiftcast, it's pretty much one of the worst healing CDs in the game. Especially for being our 'ultimate' lv60 spell. The AF stacks are useful for Scholar opening rotations to allow you to weave in more Energy Drains. That's about it. Some Scholars will use it, and I know a lot of Scholars don't even have it on their hotbars.
For these reasons, I think it more adequate to change the spell's usage as opposed to buffing what it currently is.
fey illumination and dissipation make your healing spells do 44% more than its normal values.
And an extra 3 aetherflow stacks...
Still working on trying some endgame on SCH but I suspect Dissipation is actually quite powerful. OTOH, it might be nice if it would also reset the indom timer...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.