If you choose to take it that way, that's your prerogative. I, however, was asking a serious question.
What part of it deserved a response?
Where he said "These are the stupidest threads ever", suggesting a preformed bias against threads against parsers?
Where he admitted he only got up to 15 pages before "summing it up"?
Where he just made a biased strawman "summary" based on his own self-admitted lack of knowledge of what the thread actually contains because he didn't read it all?
Which of those parts deserved a response? Which of those should I respond to that I shouldn't expect should just be a giant waste of my time because he likely won't bother reading it fairly?