Results -9 to 0 of 807

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Viridiana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,481
    Character
    Aria Placida
    World
    Lamia
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 88
    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    Regardless, you also ignored that if someone can't accept 500 DPS when they could be doing 1200 DPS, they're not going to accept 600 DPS when they could be doing 1400, which means that while they might be doing higher numbers, it doesn't actually solve any problems. You claim I'm shifting goalposts, but it's more like you just grabbed the ball and ran off the side of the field.
    I could probably do close to 1400 DPS with current gear. If I did 550 instead, do you honestly think I'd get kicked?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    Except it isn't inherently an "all or nothing" issue. It entirely can be based around scale of effect. If they decide that the potential for abuse of parsers is just significantly higher than potential for abuse of titles, why do you feel you're owed that explanation of how they come to that?
    Because they've used the justification before for tells in dungeons even though it appears to have zero effect. So when they trot it out again you ask for evidence.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    No it isn't.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    And whether I was or wasn't, would it prove my point at all? Of course not.
    Does literally every sentence you make have to be directly in support of your argument, or are you allowed to have sentences for flavor to break up the monotony of assertions and questions?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    People can convince themselves they're suffering, but that doesn't mean they are. The game's lasted two years without an official parser, so it's not like the parser is necessary for the game's survival.
    Right. Because PS3/PS4 players having to rely on others in order to just see their DPS numbers isn't a type of suffering.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    If only there was some sort of in-game list to which we could add the names of people we don't like. Some sort of a really, really dark list. Y'know? Like, so dark it's black or something.
    Which is awesome for those of us on Balmung or JP servers where gil spam barely happens if at all. I can't say how it's going on other servers, but considering 2,000 accounts have been banned since HW launch for RMT advertisement, I'm guessing other servers have better things to do with their blacklists. Unless you're suggesting that they keep a list of people in their blacklist that are bad so they don't accidentally un-blacklist them when clearing the RMT accounts. Which kinda defeats the point of using the blacklist for it. >_>

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    If someone doesn't care enough about how good they are to read their tooltips or look rotations up on the internet, I don't consider it my duty to help them as they probably don't think it's my duty to help them.
    So people aren't worth helping if they don't help themselves? Very altruistic of you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    EX Primals are meant to be examples of the harder content in the game, yes. I'm sure there's a reason why there's no EX Primal roulette. I honestly doubt they're even designed with DF in mind, which is supported with the fact that when they first come out, you can't DF them.
    But you said it was the hardest content. Was that hyperbole, or did you literally mean that it was the hardest content? And really, I was being generous when I asked if you were really saying that Ravana Ex was the hardest content, because you actually referenced "Ex Primals" as the hardest content in the game, which presumably includes Bismark. That means you technically put Bismark Ex over, say, A4S. Unless that was hyperbole, of course. >_>

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    And some will think that digging for numbers just makes you a bigger jerk.
    Ooooooptionnnnns. Options. Say it with me: Options. Maybe look in the mirror as you say it until you can say it without scrunching up your face.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    If they couldn't be bothered to put in a report for harassment, I'd be surprised if they bothered to answer the question.
    Maybe. Filing a report is way more tedious than clicking a link and hitting a few buttons. Heck, it's something some people could do at work.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
    since their opinion is what matters (since it's their game and their money at stake), it doesn't matter whether or not I agree.
    That's how stagnation happens. If we all took this stance, WAR would still be a joke tank never used for anything end-game. After all, Yoshida told 2.0 WARs to git gud and that WAR was fine.

    Edit:
    Quote Originally Posted by spelley View Post
    Guys?

    Seriously.
    It's a good start, but you need like, 10 more lines or so. And I personally prefer to maintain the shiny pictures!
    (2)
    Last edited by Viridiana; 09-10-2015 at 01:25 AM.