

Read again please the bold parts in my message and in the quote.
Read again.
Read.
Read.
Again.
They said triple crits. I said non-critical. So Barrage can't do triple crits.
Oh, I see. You are embarrassed that you said something that was incorrect and now you've taken to trolling. Can't say I'm surprised.
As I said in my first post, move along people, nothing to see here.
EDIT: On the off chance you aren't trolling, I'll reiterate for you:
You said, "Auto-attacks off
Barrage off (because there are no auto-attacks so there's nothing to triple)"
Barrage was changed to affect weaponskills, not auto-attacks.
Last edited by Kaedan94; 07-17-2015 at 03:06 PM.


Maybe next time you'll actually read the post before posting irrelevant nonsense.Oh, I see. You are embarrassed that you said something that was incorrect and now you've taken to trolling. Can't say I'm surprised.
As I said in my first post, move along people, nothing to see here.
EDIT: On the off chance you aren't trolling, I'll reiterate for you:
You said, "Auto-attacks off
Barrage off (because there are no auto-attacks so there's nothing to triple)"
Barrage was changed to affect weaponskills, not auto-attacks.
And with arrogant attitude like this, you are not welcome in this topic.
Listen, I understand you're upset that we pointed out you were wrong about something. But not acknowledging it and then making false accusations won't get you anywhere.
1)Barrage no longer affects auto-attacks, it affects weaponskills. (In response to this statement: "Barrage off (because there are no auto-attacks so there's nothing to triple)")
2) "Constant" cast interruptions is hyperbole. It's 1.5 seconds. If you activate the skill before the ground AoE appears, there are no AoEs that you can't get out of before it finishes. Unless you have a really crappy internet connection. (In response to this statement: "Constant 'cast' interruptions when you are moving out of AOE")
3) Plus there's the new skills that can only be used in WM, and the bonuses they have from VB and WB. (helping to further add more damage on top of the 30% bonus to all other weapon skills).
So I refuted two of your three points (Auto-attacks off is true, but more than made up for with the 30% and new skills). That is not "irrelevant nonsense". It's your "fingers-in-your-ears" response to having your argument defeated.


Autoattacks discussion ended after a couple of first posts when people said the skill was updated. It was after that. The guy posted something about triple crits for 6k damage with Barrage. I pointed out that you can't crit with Barrage anymore. You quoted that my answer and started 'Weaponskill, Weaponskill' nonsense which was completelly irrelevant by that point because we were discussing crits already.
Seems to me like you just do not read any other answers and have no idea what's going on in the thread.


Hahaha wow it was frustrating reading your conversation.
Kaedan94's attitude thinking he/she is dping everything right, and then he/she isn't following the conversation at all, commenting on things that doesnt even have anything to do with the conversation.
I know people like that, they turn everything they read or hear to what they want to read or hear. its veeery annoying and frustrating
http://websta.me/n/kiaraicencroft.ffxiv (Kiaraicencroft.ffxiv@instagram)


Yeah, it's extremely frustrating. My first post was in response to his OP, and after all this time he has yet to even acknowledge that his argument has been defeated. Instead, he keeps going on about "I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about this", when I quite clearly and directly refocused the conversation back to my main point, which was refuting his OP, which he still never responded to in favor of trolling and bringing up irrelevant crap based on something someone else said.
Yes, very frustrating. I know nosy people that butt into other's conversations without any context or knowledge of what's actually being talked about too. They selectively read whatever they want to... veeeery annoying and frustrating.


Why does he have to acknowledge it, though? From what I read, he learned that barrage was still used with WM but brought up a new issue he had with it, blocking crits. Do you want him to say he was wrong? Why?Yeah, it's extremely frustrating. My first post was in response to his OP, and after all this time he has yet to even acknowledge that his argument has been defeated. Instead, he keeps going on about "I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about this", when I quite clearly and directly refocused the conversation back to my main point, which was refuting his OP, which he still never responded to in favor of trolling and bringing up irrelevant crap based on something someone else said.
Yes, very frustrating. I know nosy people that butt into other's conversations without any context or knowledge of what's actually being talked about too. They selectively read whatever they want to... veeeery annoying and frustrating.
And people aren't being nosy, they're just wondering why we can't be a bit more friendly about all this.


To be honest, the OP came off as quite arrogant, which is probably why I adopted a similar tone and corrected him.
As for why he should acknowledge it? Because his OP has been corrected, so there's no point for the thread to exist anymore... especially since there's a hundred other threads on the same topic.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


