Lootmaster: The Greatest Abuse tool.

[rappa]

Yes, because people should be forced to compete with other groups to find members for their own group because an easily abused mechanic was implemented... >_>

There wasn't enough reason for SE to implement lootmaster. Greed only is fine, but the slight benefits of lootmaster are far outweighed by negatives.

Negative points? You can't be serious.
You join a PF and the leader choose Lootmaster: Are you agree or the leader is trusty? Yes, accept the loot rules. No? Leave the party.
You are not chained to a completed party if you are not agreed with them.
For Statics is a big tool, for selling party too.

Obviously one player could break the rules and screw up the entirely party, but bad apples are everywhere.

If you join a Master looter party and say "let's see what happens" and "i was scammed". It's not tool's fault, it's your fault to go blindfolded in a untrusty Master looter Party.

[Kaedan94]

Negative points? You can't be serious.
...

You completely missed the point.

The people who don't see the big picture keep saying, "Then don't join the group and make your own party"... like yourself. But that itself causes issues. The leader of one group insists on Lootmaster. Someone who wants to join for the same content doesn't agree, so they don't join/leave. Now they are forced to either try to join another group (if there even is one) or make their own. Now they have to compete with group 1 for members and it makes a huge mess that could have been avoided by not having lootmaster.

There's only a small benefit lootmaster gives to honest groups that pug people. It allows the leader to prevent pugs from looting when they shouldn't. But it creates far more problems. Bad idea overall.

[rappa]

You completely missed the point.

The people who don't see the big picture keep saying, "Then don't join the group and make your own party"... like yourself. But that itself causes issues. The leader of one group insists on Lootmaster. Someone who wants to join for the same content doesn't agree, so they don't join/leave. Now they are forced to either try to join another group (if there even is one) or make their own. Now they have to compete with group 1 for members and it makes a huge mess that could have been avoided by not having lootmaster.

There's only a small benefit lootmaster gives to honest groups that pug people. It allows the leader to prevent pugs from looting when they shouldn't. But it creates far more problems. Bad idea overall.

Then the problem is lazy players who are unable to create a normal loot party instead of struggling with an useful tool because they won't refuse master loot party.